Huge Paedophile Ring Surrounds UK Government and Internationally

If you watched that program on channel 4 the other day about the paedophile that outted himself, there was a good bit of it dedicated to PIE and it's rise and links to government and infiltration of various institutions and it's all well known and out there.

The abuse that happened here in Northern Ireland. The Catholic church. Boys homes. Members of both Republican and Loyalist paramilitaries. Protected by their respective churches, political wings and police handlers...
 
I can't take anything Anonymous do seriously, but seeing that headline:
'Jill Dando probed Paedophile ring'. was worth watching the first video for at least.
 
Ch99Ppa.jpg
 
So what do you all think? Is there any substance to this?

Not seen the videos yet but yes I believe it's true. One of the reasons imo why Saville was untouchable when he was alive is because of the people he could have incriminated.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for posting that OP I am sure we all really appreciate the time you have taken out making this thread what with the amount of work you have to undertake for your imminent move to Australia! ;)

Do existing high profile politicians traffic, abuse, rape and murder children?

Mind you, that sort of thing just doesn't happen any more...

Welcome back.
 
SNP activist Willie MacRae allededly murdered in 1985 after collating details of all MP and Buckingham Palace paedophiles.

Crashed car? Must be death by accident. Nope, autopsy shows bullet hole in forehead. Okay, must be suicide. Only if you can shoot yourself in the head and then throw the gun 100 yards away after firing a second shot.

One of the names on his list was the head of the Secret Service. Murder attributed to allegedly collecting details on secret nuclear dump sites but new evidence points to his collation of details that others wanted kept secret.
 
So what do you all think? Is there any substance to this?

Of course there is.

Didn't the government recently pay for propagandistic research to tell us that paedophilia is healthy and natural?

I've already predicted on this forum that world war 3 (or 4) will be between the governments and their citizens.
 
Of course there is.

Didn't the government recently pay for propagandistic research to tell us that paedophilia is healthy and normal?

I've already predicted on this forum that world war 3 (or 4) will be between the governments and their citizens.

Great Asims here. This should get ridiculous quick.
 
Calls me a troll. Rabbits on about WW3, conspiracy nonsense. You been talking to your mate doing the masters or whatever it was recently? I think he's a bad influence on you.

Enough, please.

I posted three sentences.

One which stated a mere "yes" or agreement with someone not yourself.

One which stated that organisations are trying to justify paedophilia. (with source)

And then a line about my personal views on the fragile relationship between governments and citizens.


I've got nothing to say to you because you're clearly very distressed or worried that I liaise frequently with academics from various fields. Which is evident because you bought it up and you even explicitly state that you don't want me talking to academics. :D You sound like some paid misinformation troll with a mission to keep people dumb.
 
Last edited:
Right you are asim18. Right you are.

If anyone wants they can go right through your post history and read all the tiresome pretentious crap you regurgitate from your oh so learned friends, that you think you know about because you may or may not talk about it, but know about as much as could be gleaned from a wikipedia article because you don't actually study it.

You're a pretentious insufferable bore when you try to make yourself look clever with your pretentious insufferable pseudo psychology knowledge.

But we've had this dance before: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18610249&page=21
 
Right you are asim18. Right you are.

If anyone wants they can go right through your post history and read all the tiresome pretentious crap you regurgitate from your oh so learned friends, that you think you know about because you may or may not talk about it, but know about as much as could be gleaned from a wikipedia article because you don't actually study it.

You're a pretentious insufferable bore when you try to make yourself look clever with your pretentious insufferable pseudo psychology knowledge.

But we've had this dance before: http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18610249&page=21


I cant believe three very basic statements of mine have made you so angry enough to completely sideline the current discussion of governmental paedophilia and turn this into something about how stupid you feel compared to me.

That's right people, forget the topic of governmental paedophilia. Lets all talk about how stupid or clever people seem to be on the internet because OhEsEcks feels more strongly about it. Oh and you shouldn't discuss things with smart people too because OhEsEcks thinks you shouldn't talk with people doing a masters or above. :D
 
Last edited:
I cant believe three very basic statements of mine have made you so angry enough to completely sideline the current discussion of governmental paedophilia and turn this into something about how stupid you feel compared to me.

Your statements don't make me angry. You as a whole make me angry. I don't feel stupid compared to you. Far from it. You're absolutely nowhere near as intelligent as you like to pretend. THAT is the problem. And I don't know why people haven't called you out for your ******** before. But I've decided I'm going to every time I see you post pretentious ********.

So please. Tell us more about World War 3 between the citizens and the state. Maybe you want to check infowars before you respond. Light up another dooby, get all profound and wooooah deep thinking man. Or are you gonna regale us with your tales of getting mac 10s in 10 minutes. While being oh so learned and rubbing shoulders with high brow academia!
 
Back
Top Bottom