Personally I thought the 1st Gen was better and better value. I think the OPO is better value than the Moto G 2nd Gen.
2nd gen has bigger screen (much better imo), better camera, and an SD slot. Can't see how the first is better tbh.
Depends on what is important?
The 1st gen has bettery battery life, better speaker (even though its a single rear speaker, its louder and better IMO), better screen, even though it's smaller, it has higher PPI, better colours and brightness from what I've read about the 2nd gen? and cheaper, got the wife's brand new for £90!![]()
Samsung galaxy 3
3 years on and still does everything I need, never misses a beat and owes me nothing
Hope I've not jinxed it!
Phones of 2014...![]()