10 year old suicide bomber.

Jesus, horrible people.

Zh8NidJ
Zh8NidJl.jpg.png
Zh8NidJ
 
Using a ten year old girl as a weapon. That's just...how does that idea even enter your mind?!
 
Using a ten year old girl as a weapon. That's just...how does that idea even enter your mind?!

It's clear to see this is NOT an islamic act.
Firstly suicide is haraam
Secondly its a commandment that Women and Children can not be harmed in 'jihad'
Thirdly a clear ruling that terrorism is against Islam
Fourthly - Killing of innocent people is forbidden

BUT HEY - Lets not let the usual OCuk islamophobes get their digs in.


I wouldn't even class this as a suicide bombing! - how the f can a 10 yr old girl know what she is doing? she's still a child!

Absolutely disgusting that they would use a child to do this - I hope the people who instigated this get caught and die in the most horrific way possible. makes me sick.
 
Absolutely disgusting that they would use a child to do this - I hope the people who instigated this get caught and die in the most horrific way possible. makes me sick.

Your post would have been a lot better if the above was all you had written.:(
 
Why would boko haram care what some random guys on ocuk think about them....i even doubt they shop here.

I meant more if people are vocal about the problems with Islam maybe the world as a whole and its leaders will actually do something about the mess it causes.
 
It's clear to see this is NOT an islamic act.
Firstly suicide is haraam
Secondly its a commandment that Women and Children can not be harmed in 'jihad'
Thirdly a clear ruling that terrorism is against Islam
Fourthly - Killing of innocent people is forbidden

snip

:rolleyes: let me guess, religion of peace?
 
Why because you don't want to know the truth?

The problem is selecting quotation of conflicting passages that are easily open to interpretation. Zoomee is correct in that such things are said but then there are a body of other quotations that offer different ideas and unfortunately some people just focus on one set of messages. They then conclude that abhorrent acts are justifiable or that acts taken in the name of Islam are not sanctioned when by other texts and interpretations they are.
 
Why because you don't want to know the truth?

What was the truth in the rest of his post?

The first part was just a rehash of "nothing to do with Islam" when patently it does as the organisation involved is specifically a fundamentalist Islamist group.

The next was "look at all the Islamaphobes!" which is subjective rather objective.
 
For the absolute vast majority of Muslims it is.

The vast majority of people in this country don't have cancer. Should we stop treatment for those that do?

Just because a problem isn't in the majority doesn't mean it should be ignored.
 
Back
Top Bottom