Name one war that wasn't declared because of the actions of a minority.
exactly.... most germans weren't Nazis, yet relatively few led a majority to all-out-war.
Name one war that wasn't declared because of the actions of a minority.
So what would you have Muslims do? just wind up their religion like its a failed company going into administration? or wipe them all from existence?
I have a problem with the word 'Islamaphobe' who conjured that one up. snip.
must be something to do with not wanting to blow us up or something and maybe integrating without much fanfare, or something like that.![]()
The vast majority of people in this country don't have cancer. Should we stop treatment for those that do?
Just because a problem isn't in the majority doesn't mean it should be ignored.
There are many people who think all Muslims are linked and believe in all the same things which the educated know isn't true.
Of course it shouldn't be ignored but the vast majority of Muslims shouldn't be blamed/apologising for the actions of a few.
I'm Nigerian by birth so should I be apologising for Boko Harum because they are Nigerians?
Should you be apologising on behalf of the atrocities done by Hitler (if you are white European)?
There are many people who think all Muslims are linked and believe in all the same things which the educated know isn't true.
Should you be apologising on behalf of the atrocities done by Hitler (if you are white European)?
You'll also find it was predominantly white Europeans who stood against Hitler. Who protected and freed those he oppressed.
There is a difference between this and say for example the French events. This is more a political attack for the creation of an Islamic state. Whereas the French events were a violent response to something that is deemed to be against Islam. Your point is valid for this thread but not for the other.
There is a difference between this and say for example the French events. This is more a political attack for the creation of an Islamic state. Whereas the French events were a violent response to something that is deemed to be against Islam. Your point is valid for this thread but not for the other.
So what would you have Muslims do? just wind up their religion like its a failed company going into administration? or wipe them all from existence?
Using a ten year old girl as a weapon. That's just...how does that idea even enter your mind?!
Apologies if I'm reading this wrong but are you saying all Muslims would have agreed with the Paris incident?
What I always find weird about suicide bombers is why they have never questioned the people who radicalise them about why they haven't done it.
If being a martyr is so good they would all being doing it, right?