• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

BF Hardline - AMD cards getting panned (not by much)

Benched dustbowl 64 CQ last week, cant remember the exact fps, (not on pc at the mo). But from what I played of the beta, it runs much better than vanilla bf4. Reminded me more of CTE bf4 which is much better than the standard game.
 
humbug said:
Who knows but the problem with all these mainstream review sites is they are a business, some of them quite large with dedicated offices in multiple countries and multiple staff to pay for.

That income comes from the vendors whose hardware they review, be AMD, Nvidia, Intel, Asus, Gigabyte................

Can we really trust them given thats for all we know they could be running a system where what is said about a product and how it results depends on price.
Click to expand...

Well i played it on my system in my sig and it ran great in full screen with DX11, so i dont care what anyone else says cuz it ran great for me, they must have some sort of user error going on there. I was quite surprised at the DX11 perf but was unhappy there was no Mantle option. Then i had to run it in borderless window mode cuz DX11 is retarded on some games and blacks out my other monitors using full screen, Mantle NEVER does this.

But even in borderless of course i had to turn down a few settings but it still ran smooth. I just dont see what all the fuss is about when its a Beta that was running anyway.

How many other games run like crap even on full release?

This thread is just a waste of everyones time and just another excuse for a GPU war. People around here need to grow up. Im getting sick of this section being like this all the time. This is why i rarely post here anymore.
 
setter said:
Benched dustbowl 64 CQ last week, cant remember the exact fps, (not on pc at the mo). But from what I played of the beta, it runs much better than vanilla bf4. Reminded me more of CTE bf4 which is much better than the standard game.
Click to expand...

I don't know what it is with vanilla BF4 but it's not that nice. playing BFH for me shows up the problems that still exist in it after more than a year.

shooting and actually hitting something in vanilla BF4 too often is down to pot luck, BFH is not perfect but at least if you aim you can be confident it will hit and register that hit.
 
MyBrains said:
Well i played it on my system in my sig and it ran great in full screen with DX11, so i dont care what anyone else says cuz it ran great for me, they must have some sort of user error going on there. I was quite surprised at the DX11 perf but was unhappy there was no Mantle option. Then i had to run it in borderless window mode cuz DX11 is retarded on some games and blacks out my other monitors using full screen, Mantle NEVER does this.

But even in borderless of course i had to turn down a few settings but it still ran smooth. I just dont see what all the fuss is about when its a Beta that was running anyway.

How many other games run like crap even on full release?

This thread is just a waste of everyones time and just another excuse for a GPU war. People around here need to grow up. Im getting sick of this section being like this all the time. This is why i rarely post here anymore.
Click to expand...

Yeah, i just don't experience what [H] are feeding us, the performance is way higher than BF4, it also very smooth.

The slides that [H] put up and the way they rant on about them doesn't jell with the reality i'm experiencing.
 
Here's the fps figures from dustbowl.

Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg
76373, 600000, 91, 182, 127.288

No frame time monitor running though. Settings on ultra, x4 msaa, 1920x1200. 4770k @4.7ghz, 780's at stock, boost clocks of 1124/3005, 1097/3005.
 
I noticed cpu usage was a bit higher than bf4. But the fps figures are pretty similair to results ive got in bf4.
 
humbug said:
Yeah, i just don't experience what [H] are feeding us, the performance is way higher than BF4, it also very smooth.

The slides that [H] put up and the way they rant on about them doesn't jell with the reality i'm experiencing.
Click to expand...

1+
I wish I spent little more time running couple tests.. My time was mostly spent helping friend film for his cinematic.

Here the footage if anyone interested all recorded using amd GPUs..
Done, youtube TwoScotsmen.
 
Last edited:
humbug said:
Yeah, i just don't experience what [H] are feeding us, the performance is way higher than BF4, it also very smooth.

The slides that [H] put up and the way they rant on about them doesn't jell with the reality i'm experiencing.
Click to expand...

They are clearly Nvidia biased here. The very fact that they did not show results for the gtx 970 at 4K prove that.
 
Signature roulette anyone?

Put as many links as possible in your Sig, stealth a link to some boobies in there and see how long it takes to get caught :D
 
Cant remember how the original bf4 beta ran, (and imo the retail game is still in a beta state) but this one is very different in how it feels. Much smoother. Will i buy it, probably not as it's too expensive for what i see as basically a mod.
 
setter said:
Cant remember how the original bf4 beta ran, (and imo the retail game is still in a beta state) but this one is very different in how it feels. Much smoother. Will i buy it, probably not as it's too expensive for what i see as basically a mod.
Click to expand...

It was only Shanghai wasn't it? Well, that's the only map i played. It's played well from memory, still have a video on my YT channel and was smooth.
I just remember being a pain connecting, and then being chucked whilst in a game, BF:H seem to have that one sorted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom