Netanyahu: Iran a threat to the world.
- Thread starter Danthus
- Start date
Nope... I am sure you might be intelligent enough to work it out
Does it involve the deployment of thermo nuclear devices ?
Dropping 5000000 million puppies and associated soft toys is not the answer even the power of the puppy is not enough to solve that region. The only thing to do is bomb the mother ******* lot of them and move some sane people in.
Or let Israel take over Palestine hook line and sinker the every last inch of land. The Palestinians are powerless to stop it so they can ship out and move to somewhere else. It wont be the first time in history a land has been conquered.
oh and before you all start moaning China did exactly the same thing to Tibet and yet nothing is ever mentioned that.
Or let Israel take over Palestine hook line and sinker the every last inch of land. The Palestinians are powerless to stop it so they can ship out and move to somewhere else. It wont be the first time in history a land has been conquered.
oh and before you all start moaning China did exactly the same thing to Tibet and yet nothing is ever mentioned that.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 8,132
- Location
- one nation under sony
Well this is often true. However, some terrorists are simply terrorists, period. I regard Hamas, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, Al Shabaab etc to be nothing more than terrorists. Evil, nasty people who often murder their own when it suits them. Freedom fighters, fight for their own, they don't murder them.
Quite true, 99.99% of terrorists will always be terrorists.
And it is possible that some Palestinians feel that the Israeli Government and the IDF are Terrorists too...
I have nothing against Jews per say but their Government and Army are just as bad as the "Terrorists" they fight. You might disagree and you have that right.
If Netanyahu could get away with it they would have wiped them out already... Hell he would be at war already if USA would hold his hand.
So by your definition, what do you call people that deliberately run over Palestinians and drive off?
What do you call people who inject ancient olive grove trees with poison?
What do you call people that bulldoze peoples homes that have been there for 100 years?
What do you call people that attack Christian seminary's in East Jerusalem?
What do you call people that fire on unarmed fishing boats from military gunboats?
What do you call people that fire on unarmed peaceful protesters?
What do you call people that shoot children because they threw stones?
What do you call people who destroy a US military vessel just because it is floating near the Israeli Coastline?
And what do you call people that run over peaceful US citizens with a bulldozer?
Just trying to gauge what you regard as freedom fighters and terrorists?
The mere fact you group Hamas and ISIS together shows you have little grasp of the difference between real freedom fighters and Terrorists. ISIS have NO political elected officials.
Last edited:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/ng...ech-congress-iran-nuclear-annotated?CMP=fb_gu
Interesting article from the Guardian.
Interesting article from the Guardian.
I personally loved this one the damn hypocrite
Says the country that does the exact same thing...
Indeed, as as soon as North Korea got the bomb it immediately started firing them at all it's enemies didn't it?
They must have landed too far way from me
The thing is if I was Iranian I would want Nukes to deter that Asshat. And thats exactly what it would be is a deterrent.
Most of these countries want them as a deterrent to what they see as western aggression and when you look at it you can see why. We (Our Governments) spend too much time meddling in the affairs of countries that don't bow to our will.
Last edited:
Lone wolf morons acting as individuals and not representing the state in which they live.
Deplorable.
Deplorable.
Violent Zealots.
Deplorable. However, there is context to this which needs to be understood.
Americans. lol. No, again excessive force is deplorable.
I call the children idiots for provoking a situation which could lead to their death or injury. I call the people shooting them, deplorable for using excessive force.
Good shots ? Not familiar with this so can't comment.
Murderers ?
Why ? What's there to gauge ? I was quite clear in my earlier post with my brief definition. Again you are displaying a complete disregard for things I post. I might as well post in Japanese.
Being politically elected doesn't exempt you from being a terrorist. Dude how naive are you ?
Last edited:
So just like basically every muslim terrorist ever apart from ones from ISIS (who IIRC haven't actually done anything outside the middle east yet).
I think he's referring to the USS Liberty incident.
The Israeli navy and air force launched a combined attack on a boat in international waters which they thought was Egyptian, it turned out to be a US navy vessel.
So Netanyahu is a terrorist too then, glad we sorted that.
That's nonsense, and at some level you know it. How do you explain away the terrorist organisation which is HAMAS with that flawed logic ? Oh, that's right, rationally and honestly, you can't.
Don't be absurd.
I simply explain that they are not a terrorist organisation, and the terrorists which you were referring to (Al Qassam) are not "representing the state in which they live" which was the criteria you outlined (they may believe they are, but that's their own issue).
Last edited:
You honestly believe he is not just as bad?