Netanyahu: Iran a threat to the world.

I'm not going back through hundreds of pages of posts - you're just not that significant. I'll just give you the opportunity to clarify your views in this thread.
 
If I remember correctly the thread Amnesia's point was how many people would have to be killed before people stopped poking the bear so as to speak rather than actually suggesting a policy of appeasement he was asking at what point do you capitulate.
 
I'm not going back through hundreds of pages of posts - you're just not that significant. I'll just give you the opportunity to clarify your views in this thread.

bs claim
gets called on bs
starts squirming


at least in the past you would post something which didnt support your claim and you pretended it did.



don't you even want to try :(
 
Jerk he bombs the **** out of Gaza all the time & he is worried about Iran... The US is prob. more a threat to the world than Iran.. They talk about war a lot on the news here....
 
Last edited:
Maybe this jew is a jew-hater too?

http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.647555

Netanyahu deserves the Israeli people, and they deserve him
If after everything, the Israeli phoenix succeeded in rising from the ashes and getting reelected, something is truly broken, possibly beyond repair.

On Tuesday the foundations were laid for the apartheid state that is to come. If Netanyahu succeeds in forming the next government in his spirit and image, then the two-state solution will finally be buried and the struggle over the character of a binational state will begin. If Netanyahu is the next prime minister, then Israel has not only divorced the peace process, but also the world. **** off, dear world, we're on our own. Please don't interfere, we're asleep, the people are with Netanyahu. The Palestinians can warm the benches at the International Criminal Court at The Hague, the Israel boycotters can swing into high gear and Gaza can wait for the next cruel attack by the Israeli army.
 
Seems the U.S. and Obama aren't very happy with him.

Obama snubs Binyamin Netanyahu and criticises Israel PM's 'divisive rhetoric'
http://gu.com/p/46nvv

Hopefully there will be far more pressure on him from there, although that will only stay if the democratic candidate gets into the white house again.

If not the even more far right and racist government will probably have Carte Blanche to do what they want.
 
Oh look, its Scorza and Silver throwing the anti-semite card at anyone daring to voice opposition to Israel again....

Brother Nate tells it straight!

 
Oh look, its Scorza and Silver throwing the anti-semite card at anyone daring to voice opposition to Israel again....

I don't throw that card at anyone, just muppets. Also my name here is Sliver not Silver. If you're going to man up and have a go, at least get my name right. Now, carry on with your weak arguments. ;)
 
So he lied to the US / World - nothing new there.

What's important though is what he has to say to make the people of Israel vote for him - He told them there would be NO two-state solution and that Israel will not back down from its current course.

What does this tell you about the current state of the Israeli people bearing in mind they voted him back in again......
 
What does this tell you about the current state of the Israeli people bearing in mind they voted him back in again......

That they're no different than the Palestinians who want to enact a genocide against the Jews ? Actually less different, because Israel could enact genocide at any moment, but they don't, they show enormous restraint.
 
No he just doesn't understand how politics work. Campaign promises are often exaggerated and, as soon as the dust settles, politicians go back to reality:

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-31968676

In a US TV interview, Mr Netanyahu said he wanted a two-state solution, but said "circumstances have to change".

Yep, seems he's backtracking somewhat, possibly because of all the negative feedback he is getting worldwide over his previous statements. The worry is that as much as he may be going through the motions to try and set something up (which seems to be the case from previous efforts), he actually doesn't want anything to happen.

Are his comments after an election and political pressure what he really thinks, or are the comments just prior to the close of a very close election that looked like he may lose his true views? Personally I'm going for the former as it explains why he has helped scupper so many chances for peace and is still very pro (illegal) settler.
 
So he lied to the US / World - nothing new there.

What's important though is what he has to say to make the people of Israel vote for him - He told them there would be NO two-state solution and that Israel will not back down from its current course.

What does this tell you about the current state of the Israeli people bearing in mind they voted him back in again......

Exaggerated claims and promises, particularly those related to populism, are common in all democracies. As for the state of the Israeli people, they were not convinced by the opposition, which should have won these elections given the dire economic climate in Israel.
 
That they're no different than the Palestinians who want to enact a genocide against the Jews ? Actually less different, because Israel could enact genocide at any moment, but they don't, they show enormous restraint.

Repeating this absurd nonsense does not make it any less absurd. Not enacting genocide against Palestinians because some of them kill 2.6 Israelis a year is NOT showing restraint, it is normal behaviour. Killing 1500 people a year in response to other people of the same religion/ethnicity killing 2.6 people of your religion/ethnicity is NOT showing restraint, it's slaughtering indiscriminately.

The IRA used to kill more than 2.6 people a year in the 70's/80's/90's and you didn't see us mowing them down in their thousands, because we showed restraint, Israel could learn a lot from us.
 
Repeating this absurd nonsense does not make it any less absurd. Not enacting genocide against Palestinians because some of them kill 2.6 Israelis a year is NOT showing restraint, it is normal behaviour. Killing 1500 people a year in response to other people of the same religion/ethnicity killing 2.6 people of your religion/ethnicity is NOT showing restraint, it's slaughtering indiscriminately.

The IRA used to kill more than 2.6 people a year in the 70's/80's/90's and you didn't see us mowing them down in their thousands, because we showed restraint, Israel could learn a lot from us.

Silver, Sliver or Slither, whatever his name is, is tapped in the head!

You would get more sense out of a stick of rock! :D
 
That they're no different than the Palestinians who want to enact a genocide against the Jews ? Actually less different, because Israel could enact genocide at any moment, but they don't, they show enormous restraint.

Oh really? Israel has an arm length full of genocide and atrocities, from Lebanon to Jenin, they hate arabs and are hell bent on killing them and their supporters such as you are a good representation of that as you have the same sort of hatred.

As for nethanyahu, he is merely backtracking because of the criticism he is getting, he and Israel have no real interest in a peace deal or a palestinian state, they have been sabotaging those plans for decades and continue land grabbing.
 
That they're no different than the Palestinians who want to enact a genocide against the Jews ? Actually less different, because Israel could enact genocide at any moment, but they don't, they show enormous restraint.

Well if what we have seen is an example of restraint by Israel then I dread to think what would happen if the leash came off.
 
Back
Top Bottom