Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jan 2004
- Posts
- 33,059
- Location
- Rutland
Relative to what's in front of him smartarse.
You'll do well here, getting into the swing of things already.
Relative to what's in front of him smartarse.
I wouldn't give it to them, because as this thread shows they might not agree that the truck was in the wrong and create un-necessary hassle.
Apart from a couple of 'mavericks' I don't think people are disagreeing that the truck was in the wrong, simply pointing out that this is a good example of why non-fault accidents increase premiums.
There are drivers that would have seen a foreign lorry straddling two lanes and decided to hang back a bit and see where he went first and there are drivers who zip into the blind spot and make their turn assuming the lorry is going to behave entirely as it 'should' before getting tagged on the back end.
It's all very well being 'in the right' and driving as you think you ought to be able to but sometimes it's best to just let it go and let other people drive like knobs and avoid the potential for an accident.
I've not read the last 6 pages of comments, but maybe the lorry driver was taking a swing to go right? I mean even if he was in the right hand lane to go right would the lorry even make that sort of roundabout? it looks small!
Him taking up both lanes may be an idication that he is making way for a tight corner, but he should have had his indicator on nonetheless...
good job you have the video and glad you are ok, and the jag stood up to that no problem! he is in the wrong no doubt.
How much time/space does the lorry have to get over to right lane anyway? I imagine that's a more difficult manoeuvre (especially Lhd) with cars flying past.
How much time/space does the lorry have to get over to right lane anyway? I imagine that's a more difficult manoeuvre (especially Lhd) with cars flying past.
LHD truckers are blind on RHD roundabouts.
The op was already in the LHD drivers blind spot, once the truck started to turn right, his mirrors would have shown him the side of his trailer, nothing else due to the angle of the cab and the trailer combination.
The driver wouldn't and couldn't have seen the OP, all the more reason for him (the trucker) to have indicated and moved with extreme caution once he'd resoused he was in the wrong lane / about to go the wrong way.
Having looked at the junction on Google Maps, it's a very short stretch and when you consider that and then rewatch the video, it's as if the truck has started to move right (albeit without indicating), has seen a car approaching quickly and so abandoned the lane change (hence hovering over the lines) before himself assuming the car was going to straight line the roundabout and so hits the car when it actually turns left because he hadn't slowed enough to allow a car to turn in front of him.
No thought whatsoever given to the hgv which you should know has reduced vision. I hope you don't get a penny.
.Wind your neck inYou wind your neck in little boy.

The hgv was occupying both lanes so the car should have held back in lane and waited to see what the lorry was going to do but no it's all me, me, me... selfish driving and I'm personally glad he got pranged. Lesson learnt.

Apart from a couple of 'mavericks' I don't think people are disagreeing that the truck was in the wrong, simply pointing out that this is a good example of why non-fault accidents increase premiums.
There are drivers that would have seen a foreign lorry straddling two lanes and decided to hang back a bit and see where he went first and there are drivers who zip into the blind spot and make their turn assuming the lorry is going to behave entirely as it 'should' before getting tagged on the back end.
It's all very well being 'in the right' and driving as you think you ought to be able to but sometimes it's best to just let it go and let other people drive like knobs and avoid the potential for an accident.
Relative to what's in front of him smartarse.


Do you always drive like a ******? Genuine question