Taylor Evolution Swift 1 - Kim Kardashian 0

arknor said:
men seem expected to have muscles these days or an athletic figure.

women on the other hand only have to not stuff their faces every day to be considered as having an attractive body
Click to expand...

It is harder to be athletic than skinny, but I think there is less of an expectation for men to be athletic than there is for women to be skinny.
 
Castiel said:
Taylor swift every time. Class is attractive. Kim Kardashian has none.
Click to expand...

Yup

Really don't understand the appeal of the huge ass... long legs/slender athletic body any day.

Marylin Monroe had 'curves' but in a good way, in proportion - she's actually not particularly big by today's standards, Kim Kardashian is a much bigger than that with a huge ass that some people find attractive - I really don't see the appeal.
 
arknor said:
men seem expected to have muscles these days or an athletic figure.

women on the other hand only have to not stuff their faces every day to be considered as having an attractive body
Click to expand...

That can work when they're younger but being slender through lack of eating generally isn't a good look. Both sexes benefit from exercise as far as asthetics are concerned. Dancers, swimmers etc... tend to have the best figures IMO.
 
Nitefly said:
Poor girls - men can get away with a bit of chub but we all like our girls to be skinny as (to our eyes at least).
Click to expand...

Just as men are expected to have wide shoulders, thin waists and athletic.

Don't want him freakishly tall, but he's got to be over 6'
But not TOO built as thats gross
but not TOO skinny as that's no good either.
God forbid if he doesn't have enough hair.

Both genders have it pretty tough to be honest.
 
sports_brah said:
Just as men are expected to have wide shoulders, thin waists and athletic.

Don't want him freakishly tall, but he's got to be over 6'
But not TOO built as thats gross
but not TOO skinny as that's no good either.
God forbid if he doesn't have enough hair.
Both genders have it pretty tough to be honest.
Click to expand...

None of that matters if his e-peen XP=85% or more.
 
Xordium said:
Shaking booty - Check
Cheerleader Outfit - Check
Crotch shot - Check
Boobs shot - Well she tried her best.


Dressed in lingerie - Check
Legs akimbo - Check


Now that is in the same league as say Wrecking Ball but it is displaying sexualised imagery and I don't really care that it does. Fine by me.
Click to expand...

As someone who's never seen the shake it off video before and from a purely analytical, unbiased viewpoint... i can't help but feel you missed the satirical intention of the video in that it showed her feeling much more comfortable in a black full length outfit having fun with everyday people than the other stereotypical video conformities she was actually poking fun of. Kinda goes against your own point a little bit ;)
 
I prefer Kim by a long shot, I'm partial to a big booty, I'm a hips and bum man, and hate the idea of seeing a womans ribs with her top off.

So no, my preference is not some skinny rake as an 'ideal female' lol.
 
Taylor swift is certainly a classier sort of girl, not a fan of her music though. As for Kim kardashian, i just cant see what the appeal of her is. But then im not a fan of any sort of trashy reality tv.
 
I do not see anything attractive about KK, physically or as a person in general, Swift on the other hand, although she also is far from perfect, I would endure to give her the three most disappointing minutes of her life
 
KK's ass honestly makes me feel queasy... it's gross and misshapen. There is no contest between her and Taylor, give me the leggy swan-like body any day of the week!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom