Are some races inherently superior to other races?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Caporegime
Joined
28 Jan 2003
Posts
40,053
Location
England
This can be a contentious issue, but I hope we can discuss it like adults. For a long time, many people have suggested that some races may have some inherent worth that others races do not. If you believe that some particular race is superior to other races, please explain why and do not post your opinion without some rational justification.

For instance, the marathon is a 42.195 kilometres race, supposedly a length in homage to Pheidippides, a Greek messenger who died running as fast as he could to deliver the news of the Greek victory over the Persians. One could argue, however, that it's enormously long standing tradition lends it particular value as a premiere race.

The triathlon, by contrast, is known for its variance rather than its tradition. It's prominence is mostly a consequence of this variance -- testing multiple avenues of human endurance. Does this variance make it a more worthwhile race than one based purely on running?

One could have course argue that any value we confer upon a race is purely arbitrary, and not a reflection of some inherent worth. Do you feel that is true? Why or why not?

Again, I ask that everyone discuss this issue like mature adults. I know some of us may be come particularly attached to a race we participate in or which we watch fervently.
 
No as we're all the same race, homosapien, despite the fact too many people, from all races, forget that fact.
 
as said we are all the same race, the same species.
not only that but the dna of the human race is extremely narrow in variation due to an almost extinction event about 70,000 years ago - whether we like it or not we are all very similar.

edit: doh!
 
Are there differences, absolutely. Doesn't make people superior. Just makes some more suited to some small things than others.


Look at skin colour and cancer/vitamin D.
Then there's a few small populations that are extremely good runners.
Other tribes as they've always lived at high altitude are far better than the rest of us at high altitudes.
 
Are there differences, absolutely. Doesn't make people superior. Just makes some more suited to some small things than others.


Look at skin colour and cancer/vitamin D.
Then there's a few small populations that are extremely good runners.
Other tribes as they've always lived at high altitude are far better than the rest of us at high altitudes.

...
 
Are there differences, absolutely. Doesn't make people superior. Just makes some more suited to some small things than others.


Look at skin colour and cancer/vitamin D.
Then there's a few small populations that are extremely good runners.
Other tribes as they've always lived at high altitude are far better than the rest of us at high altitudes.
b6488ee3.gif
 
Seems to be working so far. I never understood why the 100m had such a big thing made of it vs others.
 
Did you actually read the OP?

My favourite race is the 100 metre sprint.

Obviously not but 2 things in my defence. Firstly I'm watching The Flash so not totally concentrating and secondly this is one of the more right wing forums going and a fair few nut jobs on here probably believe the thread title at face value :D
 
Seems to be working so far. I never understood why the 100m had such a big thing made of it vs others.

People have short attention spans so 100m is perfect, As this thread shows people cant even read past 1st line before giving their opinion on something they havent read.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom