The number of drug users wont change even if the costs are reduced, and what you would see is lower crime to fund drug use, higher quality safer drugs that are more consistent, and ultimately fewer deaths.
We really need to view drug use as a health problem rather than a criminal problem.
Yeah I did cover that in my first reply. The one you've quoted was aimed at the government just slapping tax ontop. I should get in the habit of quoting the message in reply to even when directly after it sorry.
I'm not 100% convinced we wouldn't see an increase in users. Whilst a decrease in cost is unlikly to increase users as they would already fund themselves at whatever cost, I believe legalising it would see an increase in users. However with it being legalised the majority of dangers of drugs will be neutralised by maintaining standards. It could also have the added benifit of reducing the costs of policing if it wasn't a criminal activity.
Whilst the drugs themselves are damaging hopefully the tax accrued would offset or exceed the costs of treatment.
Really I don't see the argument for not legalising them and pricing the drug dealers out of the market.
(Should add I'm not a drug user. I've smoked weed a couple of times years ago but that was it)
Last edited:
.
.
