The candidates for Labour leader are very poor indeed, it'll be a good few elections until they will win only because people will want a change, Cameron was dreadful in his election campaign, he must think he's untouchable which he is i'm afraid.
I don't agree. He seemed quite happy to get a bit obsessive over a cost of living crisis which evidently a large amount of the country didn't sympathise with. Posts on here make better rebuttals to Tory claims of economic competence than anything I heard coming out of PMQs.
If it hadn't been for the unions, we would have ended up with David Miliband as leader and I suspect a completely different outcome.
Agreed on Chuka Umunna in particular. He seems to epitomise the newest generation of smarmy, weasely politician. Tristram was also a joke whenever chatting rubbish about education - I'm not saying there wasn't anything to be said, but the topics they picked were stupid and being disingenuous with regards to things like 'unqualified teachers' was off-putting.
I'd put money on Chuka Umunna, in my opinion he's been primed in the media (ie on tv etc) to be leader for the last year if not longer.
Whether he's the right person is another matter.
I know labour are serious about getting a decent leader but I can't see them winning Scotland back for a long time and that will mean they will not be in power. Whoever leads labour will probably fail at the next election. We will likely have SNP ruling Scotland for the next 10+ years. Labour will never be in power without Scotland.
Labour should not pick...
A. Champagne Socialist.
B. Anyone associated with Ed Balls and Labour economic strategy
C. Anyone with ties to Blair and the Iraq War.
D. Union Stooge
E. Privileged Toff
So that rules out Chuka Umunna, Yvette Cooper, David Miliband, Tom Watson and Tristram Hunt.