Associate
- Joined
- 27 Feb 2012
- Posts
- 3
Hi,
Hoping someone at OCuK can answer this one?
Busy looking for a new card and settled on getting the GTX 970, with my next choice being which one... So naturally I went straight to MSI as I have been using Twin Frozr cards for a while, and I didn't think that you could get that Nvidia reference cooler for the 970... until I came across the OCuK GTX 970.
My question is, with the much higher price tag compared to the other 970's, why are the clock speeds left at what seems to be default clocks? Surely with the upgrades to the card and better memory modules, the card is not being served justice with such low clock speeds?
I know that you can just overclock the card, but for someone like me who is able to build a PC, but never messed around with overclocking, it feels like it's not worth my money to pay the premium over higher clocked cards which are about £30 cheaper.
Hoping someone at OCuK can answer this one?
Busy looking for a new card and settled on getting the GTX 970, with my next choice being which one... So naturally I went straight to MSI as I have been using Twin Frozr cards for a while, and I didn't think that you could get that Nvidia reference cooler for the 970... until I came across the OCuK GTX 970.
My question is, with the much higher price tag compared to the other 970's, why are the clock speeds left at what seems to be default clocks? Surely with the upgrades to the card and better memory modules, the card is not being served justice with such low clock speeds?
I know that you can just overclock the card, but for someone like me who is able to build a PC, but never messed around with overclocking, it feels like it's not worth my money to pay the premium over higher clocked cards which are about £30 cheaper.