True. It takes a generational change in the moral zeitgeist. The older bigots need to die off and make way for the younger liberal egalitarian people.
Ireland votes on gay marriage - why should I care?
- Thread starter scorza
- Start date
True. It takes a generational change in the moral zeitgeist. The older bigots need to die off and make way for the younger liberal egalitarian people.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 4,095
What a bigoted world view you have.
I bet if you'd have held a referendum on whether black people in America should have equality you'd have got an overwhelming response of "yes they should". Not sure what point you're trying to make tbh.
Please explain. You're the bigot here, you've made that patently obvious with your abhorrent posts. I notice you haven't countered my post above. Hard to counter the truth though so I understand that.
Anyway, as I'm an egalitarian who fights for equality (the opposite of you) please elaborate on why I am the bigot here.
Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 3,653
- Location
- Dublin, Ireland
Pleased to see the religious bigots are losing ground. Atheism is on the rise and more liberal outlooks amongst theists is on the rise too. Well done Ireland.
This is the response of equality? That reads like up yours you lot…
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,386
- Location
- Darwen
Why can't two people of the same gender love each other the same as opposite gender?
Also reproduction isn't the purpose of marriage, the religious definition might but I don't want to be married in a church.
What's wrong with polygamy or incestual marriages?
Outside of the legal aspect, nothing.
Yeah all that's wrong with the world is gays getting married, christ on a bike. Money is the reason our civilisation is doomed. The bankers got us into this mess and wars are waged for control of oil in the name of democracy. Get a sense of perspective you bigot.
Even if she'd been the victim of rape you'd have her have the rapists baby and of she didn't want it you'd abandon her?
But even if it was your kids that's a horrible emotional pressure to put on her and it will get transferred to the baby. Ie she never wanted it but only had it as she didn't want to be abandoned by the man she loved.
How you interpret words is on you not me. Equality for all under the law is all I'm advocating. If you don't agree with that then 'up yours' might be a correct interpretation.
The big cheesy grin was a bit of a giveaway.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 4,095
I am not intolerant of people with differing opinions. I don't make snide comments about their person just because I disagree with them. You take every opportunity to insult those who disagree with you. Let me highlight each time you do it, just to make it clear.
As for not responding to your post, I didn't see it. Here is my response -
Homosexuals relationships are not equal to heterosexual relationships. It's like you're saying 1+1=2 and 1+2=3 so 1+1 = 1+2. Well, no, no it doesn't They are different.
Of course I know that heterosexual couples may not have children. I've addressed it countless times.
Taking the time to respond to this was a waste of my time.
I've already addressed this, but let me say it again: Enabling homosexual delusions about the status of their relationships is damaging to civilized society. It reduced the value of marriage and opens the door to things such as polygamy, incest and so forth.
It represents the weakening of the primary unit of civilization: the family. And for what? So so some deluded hipsters can feel good about themselves because they grew up on a diet of liberal media?
Basically, Western civilization has gone from being strong and virile to limp-wristed and weak. We cannot even defend our own borders from illegal immigrants anymore, our productivity is declining, birth rates are dropping, the Muslims are running rampant. We're done. This is just another nail in the coffin.
You can't hide your disgusting horrible views Thompson just by making a big post. We all know you're not a tolerant person who likes to exercise his prejudice. Every time you type you just shame yourself further and distance yourself further from what most would regard as a decent human being.
Every time you type you just shame yourself further and distance yourself further from what most would regard as a decent human being.
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 4,095
Same sex, not gender. Gender is some nonsense made up by a paedophile a few decades ago. But I don't know whether they can or cannot, I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.
Yes, it is. The traditional function of marriage is to provide legitimacy to the offspring of a couple. Its modern concept may have been twisted by the liberal elite, but that remains its purpose.
You really need me to explain what is wrong with them, or are you being obtuse?
I have perspective, I think that is my curse. But thanks for the ad-hom, bigot.
Errr no its not marriage is about property and ownership.
Nothing to do with kids
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 4,095
You can't hide your disgusting horrible views Thompson just by making a big post. We all know you're not a tolerant person who likes to exercise his prejudice.
Where do you get the idea I am trying to hide anything? I think I am being forthright and clear in my opinions.
I feel no shame whatsoever for holding these views. My hands and concious are clean. You however seem to be a very angry young man who cannot control his emotions.
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,386
- Location
- Darwen
Paedophile?
It's really not. Why would you want to promote procreation in a world that is increasingly overpopulated.
There is nothing wrong with them, how does it affect you if a husband has two or more wives or a wife has two or more husbands?You really need me to explain what is wrong with them, or are you being obtuse?
I'm well aware of the genetic reason incest is illegal but two consenting adults should be able to do whatever they want within the law.
No you don't have perspective, you are claiming that allowing gays to marry is somehow indicative of the fall of modern society. You are worse than the UKIP idiots that say the flooding is gods wrath on the acceptance of gays.
That's the problem though. You think you can hold these views with a clear conscience when the majority of decent people look at what you say and try really hard not to vomit.
LOL. I'm a polemicist, haven't you noticed ? Don't mistake clarity for aggression, first rule of debate.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2013
- Posts
- 4,095
Yes, he was.
Because we wish to at the very least, maintain our existing population level. What people in China, India or Africa do is their business.
In most cases of polygamy, its one man with multiple wives. This presents problems when they start to have children, since the man cannot support multiple partners. It also reduces the social value of those women, and by proxy, all women.
Two men sharing one woman will almost certainly happen, but a man who shares his wife with another man, is not a man worth speaking of.
A sexual attraction to your sibling is almost certainly a manifestation of some mental health issues. What normal person finds their sibling sexually attractive? We should protect those people from themselves.
Nice ad-hom.
