Well the numbers will be running in the corners and settings will be shown for each game, so not much I can really do other than show what is what. I have always been unbiased and fair in my reviews, so people should expect that to remain (of which it will of course).
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
- Status
Well the numbers will be running in the corners and settings will be shown for each game, so not much I can really do other than show what is what. I have always been unbiased and fair in my reviews, so people should expect that to remain (of which it will of course).
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,222
Then you know nothing of the real world end of story.
Dat irony.
NVidia appear to have the best hands to play with though.
I might be wrong but if 390X were that special I'd have expected 'unofficial' official benchmark leaks by now to hype everyone up and **** on NVidia's parade, I've not heard AMD be this silent since before Bulldozer but that could just be down to the new management.
Last edited:
I look forward to that review gregster. Will you be benching any u-b-eye-soft games?
I fancy me a water cooled card, but don't want to fork out too much as I will be definitely getting a 16nm card when they come out next year.
It just needs to be under £500 and pretty decent, or I can't justify it in truth. I am not rich but do love doing the game reviews and hardware reviews on Youtube, so I don't mind splashing that much.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,222
Good and I thought you were pretty fair with your 290x review. I think you get my point though.
The same could be said in reverse, if it were crappy you'd hear about it too!
Gregs a raging Nvidia fan boy at times , But watch his reviews He seems fair when he had the 290 IMO
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 14,583
It would be meaningless unless we see official reviews. Remember how 6970 was hyped up to be a 580 beater at £100 less before launch? We all know how that one ended...while it WAS £100 cheaper than the 580, it was no 580 beater.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Dec 2013
- Posts
- 2,589
I would like to see Greg to put the Fiji against the TX, he may prefer Nvidia but the 290X review seemed fair and unbiased to me.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,222
If you seriously don't think somebody would buy a product to further there point of view my point stands you know nothing. It's just about the silliest thing I have heard today.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Dec 2013
- Posts
- 2,589
For someone to pay that kind of cash to further their personal agenda would seem a little odd to me, not saying its impossible but seems rather unlikely.
A paid shill will do exactly that though
Not saying Greg is paid by a particular company.
Associate
- Joined
- 3 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 1,379
You are being stupid, even big websites present bias as they can be bought out. You only have to read the news to realise nearly everything is corrupt at every level (youtubers were being sponsored for reviews and keeping it secret initially, Fifa has no competition yet is ran by corrupt idiots, bankers may as well be fraudsters, politicians half the time are paid shills who will make decisions based on bribes / interests, we have evidence of police ignoring rapes across the country from muslims and other minorities against young girls, turkey and other gulf states funding isis etc.). There's a lot less honest people out there than you think but sure, no one would ever present misleading information on the internets lol
Not that I distrust him and if he's showing the numbers and settings fairly then it's fine but it's not beyond imagination or even beyond commonplace action.
Seriously? I love hardware and be it from AMD or NVidia or Intel, I will be as fair as possible. Nobody sends me things for review and I have paid for all my own tech and have always said that when recommending cards, I have recommended on their price and wishes, which most times has been an AMD card.
Soldato
- Joined
- 28 May 2007
- Posts
- 10,222
You are being stupid, even big websites present bias as they can be bought out. You only have to read the news to realise nearly everything is corrupt at every level (youtubers were being sponsored for reviews and keeping it secret initially, Fifa has no competition yet is ran by corrupt idiots, bankers may as well be fraudsters, politicians half the time are paid shills who will make decisions based on bribes / interests, we have evidence of police ignoring rapes across the country from muslims and other minorities against young girls, turkey and other gulf states funding isis etc.). There's a lot less honest people out there than you think but sure, no one would ever present misleading information on the internets lol
Not that I distrust him and if he's showing the numbers and settings fairly then it's fine but it's not beyond imagination or even beyond commonplace action.
Couldn't have put it better myself.
Associate
- Joined
- 3 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 1,379
Yeah and that's why everyone is saying they trust you but it's just dumb to trust people automatically. No offense but first time I saw your comments I felt like you was giving off a big NV fanboy vibe so it's still a bit difficult to give people full on trust if you know they have a clear preference. It's bound to lessen objectivity a little but you seem like the kind who isn't going to let it get out of hand or blur the facts. Seen plenty vouch for you but maybe just lower the rhetoric against AMD at times
Either way we're letting this get off topic I think :? Prob best to start talking about AMD having nothing to say again.
- Status