Theresa May Wants To Deport All Foreign Benefit Claimants!

So, if Theresa May can do this with the Human Rights Act still in place, why are the Conservatives trying to replace the Human Rights Act?
 
The Geezer said:
Poor foreigners get the boot, now that's a headline !

No mention of going after the oligarch's who are domiciled elsewhere therefore have no liabilities to our country where they live.

The Tory's continue their spin; make sure the have nots' keep sticking it to the really have nots'
Click to expand...

So you are against this then? Can I ask why?
 
to be fair this is being grossly misrepresented.

does anyone including the op believe its going to be apply to any immigrant who claims any benefits? or will that only be extreme cases.
 
anticonscience said:
So you are against this then? Can I ask why?
Click to expand...

I'm against anyone not being given a fair crack at making something of themselves. My biggest concern is that our hospitality and care sectors are made up of people on low wages which in turn receive tax credits to make up the shortfalls.

Now, the way I read the statement from the OP; or unable to support themselves or family means if the government doesn't like the look of you on a poor wage made up with tax credits then you're are out.

Why not stick to the existing law - if you are a criminal then the government can throw the book at you ?
 
Last edited:
drakioned said:
You're kind of in the wrong forum to be asking that question, given how right wing this place is. Half the people here would probably have them shot on sight for being poor and their foreign family billed for the cost of the bullet.

Also, in before somebody says something like "Why not? China does that to criminals".
Click to expand...

This forum isn't that right wing.
 
That is no good. I'm very disappointed. What happened to caring for humanity.

I think we should start deporting British criminals. Isn't that what you people keep calling scum constantly?! Or does that only apply to foreigners?
 
dirtychinchilla said:
That is no good. I'm very disappointed. What happened to caring for humanity.

I think we should start deporting British criminals. Isn't that what you people keep calling scum constantly?! Or does that only apply to foreigners?
Click to expand...

theres definitly some dodgy state out there that would take them for a fee.
 
Well spotted OP on that sneaky bit about supporting a family, I read over it.

Anyone else find May quite worrying? The language she uses around these sensitive and complicated legal issues (e.g. deporting Abu Qatada) makes her sound like she has an axe to grind. E.g.

"By the summer, I will have changed the immigration rules so that we can end the abuse of the right to a family life. Believe you me, I get as frustrated as anybody when I see somebody who should not be in this country remaining in this country."
Click to expand...

"The public want him to be deported. I want him to be deported."
Click to expand...

"I" this, "I" that. Not to mention she keeps pushing the Snoopers Charter. We could do with a less authoritarian home sec. IMO, one who considers both sides of the argument and bases decision on the law.
 
Doesn't seem to over the top.

I don't mind that some of my tax helps poople who genuinely need it - but if you don't need it, or simply can't be bothered to be to help then they should be escorted away.

Sure we might see a reduction in the number of Take away's open etc, but hey it might open some job's for people to fill them.

Also we do have The Falklands and a few small islands dotted around, I'm sure we can use those if needed?
 
joeyjojo said:
Well spotted OP on that sneaky bit about supporting a family, I read over it.

Anyone else find May quite worrying? The language she uses around these sensitive and complicated legal issues (e.g. deporting Abu Qatada) makes her sound like she has an axe to grind. E.g.





"I" this, "I" that. Not to mention she keeps pushing the Snoopers Charter. We could do with a less authoritarian home sec. IMO, one who considers both sides of the argument and bases decision on the law.And the Home Office told Law in Action that citizenship was ".
Click to expand...

She already used a little known law to 2010 to revoked the British citizenship.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-21783475
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...itizenship-then-killed-by-drones-8513858.html


Under section 40 of the British Nationality Act 1981, as amended in 2006, the home secretary may make an order depriving a person of citizenship status if they are "satisfied that deprivation is conducive to the public good". No reasons need be given and no court approval is required.And the Home Office told Law in Action that citizenship was "a privilege, not a right".
Click to expand...

This is nothing new,she has been stripping British citizenship of people in order to avoid the need for extradition proceedings to USA....the land of the free.These new laws will just make far more easy to remove a person who not cooperative with the government...like the 24-year-old now faces the possibility of life in an American jail, without any support from his former home country.
 
Last edited:
joeyjojo said:
Anyone else find May quite worrying? The language she uses around these sensitive and complicated legal issues (e.g. deporting Abu Qatada) makes her sound like she has an axe to grind.
Click to expand...

What was so sensitive about Abu Qatada?
Nobody wanted him here.
The fact that it was so legally complicated to get rid of the cockroach is exactly what needs fixing.


People with beards and gingers are hopefully next on her list
 
Why doesnt the government actually do something to tackle the soaring housing benefit bill instead of focusing on these stupid ideas which will save sod all money and just try and convince the stupid british public that its all these forriners fault innit.

Housing benefit has risen £650million a year on average since 2010 (or over £3 billion) and 1/2 million people more people claiming it.

But on no instead of building new houses lets sell off what we have and blame the immigrants.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom