Smiler rollercoaster at Alton Towers - carriage collision

I think she's trying to be the "Katie Hopkins" of interviewers, I guess the fact that we're talking about her vindicates her "style".
 
TechMinerUK said:
Late news, just seen a BBC report saying some other theme parks have also closed since the incident on the smiler. Could this mean it is a mechanical/computer issue and not staff based :confused:
Click to expand...



They've shut all their multi carriage rides till they find out what happened remember most of the theme parks are the same company/rides come from the same company.

If it turns out there's a very odd set of circumstances that cause this to happen they'll want to put a measure in to stop that happening again.
 
She comes across like she has some kind of personal vendetta because one of her kids or family was directly involved... Is that the case?

Shes being fed stupidity through her ear piece (i hope) but god i would gladly shout at her to go and pro-create with herself.

Katie Hopkins Mk2 as someone else hinted :P
 
You just know that the moment the ride crashed, Kay burley's clitoris literally kicked a hole right through her panties, at the thought of doing interviews like that,

She's such a horrid person,
 
That was vile, the peak of rudeness and trying to put her twisted view into his words. She's got disconnect problems, one between the ears and brain, the other between brain and mouth.
 
Kay Burley is the most rancid human being to ever exist. There a TV in front of me in work that has Sky News on pretty much all day and even without sound I just can't stand looking at her repulsive face.
 
That interviewer should be sacked. Totally immature approach to her questioning like some kind of teenager in a strop. Cringe worthy.
 
I don't think she understands the concept of even though there are investigations on what can be done to improve the ride based on their findings


They are also implenting another safety protocol internally also, surely this is a good thing, rather than just say "meh we will just leave it to what ever the result of the investigation is, and we will just implement that"

This means they should have two if not more new safety protocols

One (or maybe more they have come up with themselves)
One (or maybe more based on the findings from the main investigation on the main cause)
 
4 pages of hate for the interview - we get it..

This will be a game changer for theme park safety and coaster design in this country and will certainly reveal any wider risk management issues that have so far not come to light.

We get so fixated on the illogical premise that the lack of something (accidents in this instance) is the demonstration of the presence of something else (safety) - a fundamental misunderstanding of risk.
 
ExRayTed said:
We get so fixated on the illogical premise that the lack of something (accidents in this instance) is the demonstration of the presence of something else (safety) - a fundamental misunderstanding of risk.
Click to expand...

Also thrill seeking and risk go hand in hand. Not saying that these rollercoasters are 'unsafe' or need to be 'unsafe' (their safety records speak for themselves). But to get a thrill there has to be an element of risk imo. No matter how small.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom