If it was sold as being paid back when you earn (which it almost certainly was) then he was mis-sold.
no he wasn't
If it was sold as being paid back when you earn (which it almost certainly was) then he was mis-sold.
What has that got to do with anything, you signed up fir credit. You seem very naïve. Look what you have to supply to get a mortgage. If you think what they are asking for is over the top.
I'd probably tell my mortgage company to **** off if they tried to insist on me providing bank statement for all my accounts long after we'd agreed the mortgage. More so if they said they would fine me if I didn't comply.
I don't think anyone really hopes to have a minimum wage job for the rest of they lives, that's just the situation he finds himself in.
Good on him for knuckling down and saving to get on that housing ladder, proof you don't need to be a high flyer to make something of your life. Far better that than he knocks up some bird, gets a free council house then spends all his benefits on sky tv, cigarettes and carling.
Given the shortfall in revenues for the SLC I am not surprised to see borderline illegal strong-arm tactics, nor am I surprised it's the weakest and least able to defend themselves they are going after. It may not be illegal but if they carry on they can expect a slap on the wrist from the regulator.
Because from what I was initially told there's no need to pay it off fully? Ever. After 30 years any remaining balance will be wiped off.
Why would I throw money away when the system doesn't require me to pay off this loan?
Don't listen to me tho, take it from Martin Lewis:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...ime-to-stop-calling-student-loans-a-loan.html
This is what I signed up to: a "loan" that never gets repaid unless you do very, very well. Which I didn't.
Anyway, I've written them a letter expressing my concerns and await their response.
Can they even legally check or find out how much you savings, or if you don't tell them, then what could they actually do?
The SLC is entirely government funded, but remains a private company. As such I think it's reasonable to be cautious about giving them sensitive information.
Let's also not pretend that people can go to uni without taking out a loan.
If it was sold as being paid back when you earn (which it almost certainly was) then he was mis-sold.
Tell them to check back in 5 years when you're earning 50k?![]()
Tell them to check back in 5 years when you're earning 50k?![]()
Well, just got off the phone with them.
They say I need to provide bank statements for all accounts and these must show the current balance of those accounts. I asked if I could blank out the balance (to just show transactions) and they said that would be rejected!! Apparently my bank balance is covered by the clause in the contract saying "I agree to keep the SLC updated with any changes in my circumstances". Can you believe that such a vague statement covers your bank balance?
If I don't provide full bank statements they will fine me £150 each time they request it until I comply.
The worst part is, SLC is not a govt body - it's a private company. I would provide that info to HMRC but I'm not at all happy providing this info to the SLC.
The accounts I have pay no interest, but my savings are a bit more than "a few K".
Bad news for me just keeps coming this week.