• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

It's Coming,I am Ready.Take My Money

Toronto is a great city, just don't go there in the winters, or work as you would be working two days out of three for the government to pay taxes, and also don't try to move there unless you like housing bubbles that are about to burst...lol

Canadians more polished? debatable, but certainly less aggressive and less in the face than the yanks

To op, you would better off putting this money in U.S. treasuries until year end if you want to hedge against the sliding loonie. And, if you own a house, sell that now, and buy a much cheaper place to vacation somewhere down south where it's warm.... get out before the economic correction, driven by lower commodity and subsequent housing crash corrects the mild mannered Canucks. :p

Total nonsense. But lets say you're right. This is ultimately what happens when a beautiful and much sought after country to live in is bombarded with trash from all over including the UK.
 
Total nonsense. But lets say you're right. This is ultimately what happens when a beautiful and much sought after country to live in is bombarded with trash from all over including the UK.


There is a difference between a sought after place to live (and I agree that Canada is a sought after and beautiful country due to its historically strong economy, a strong safety net for the unfortunate, a less extreme political environment, more liberal cultural views, and of course the sheer natural beauty from the Maritimes to Victoria) and overvaluation of hard assets due to cheap money, government assisted mortgages, and economic growth resulting primarily from a commodity price run up. I am assuming the "trash" you are referring to implies either immigrant, foreign investors , or both?
But, much of Canadian prosperity has been brought about by these new immigrants over the last two decades, as Canada has a higher hurdle for immigration for qualified immigrants than the US. May be there has been too much immigration which is not so qualified that is straining the government resources now. However immigration is a double edge sword, the good and bad come together and as long as the good outweigh the bad, it's a net positive.

As to the foreign investors, we can argue that the paper wealth built up in the housing bubble has been to the credit of these foreign investors. But, one thing that is undeniably "Canadian" is the failure to see the downside of anything "made in Canada". The over levering of the Canadian consumer is a very big problem brought about by Canadians themselves. And, no, it's not different this time, as it is never different when the fundamentals of demand are de-linked from the valuation of the underlying assets fueled by cheap money and excessive leverage. Higher taxes and lower disposable incomes at a personal level won't help either when the ultimate de-leveraging of the Canadian consumer occurs which it has to, as the current levels are unsustainable for the country's long term economic growth.
 
Last edited:
I love the fact that Canadia has a strategic maple syrup reserve.

I think there was even an audacious maple syrup heist a few years back.
 
Class. The one thing money can't buy though I suppose he wasn't leaning against his 15 year old Subaru Impreza with gold rims wearing his baseball cap backwards and wraparound mirrored shades so it wasn't as bad as it could have been.
 
There is a difference between a sought after place to live (and I agree that Canada is a sought after and beautiful country due to its historically strong economy, a strong safety net for the unfortunate, a less extreme political environment, more liberal cultural views, and of course the sheer natural beauty from the Maritimes to Victoria) and overvaluation of hard assets due to cheap money, government assisted mortgages, and economic growth resulting primarily from a commodity price run up. I am assuming the "trash" you are referring to implies either immigrant, foreign investors , or both?
But, much of Canadian prosperity has been brought about by these new immigrants over the last two decades, as Canada has a higher hurdle for immigration for qualified immigrants than the US. May be there has been too much immigration which is not so qualified that is straining the government resources now. However immigration is a double edge sword, the good and bad come together and as long as the good outweigh the bad, it's a net positive.

As to the foreign investors, we can argue that the paper wealth built up in the housing bubble has been to the credit of these foreign investors. But, one thing that is undeniably "Canadian" is the failure to see the downside of anything "made in Canada". The over levering of the Canadian consumer is a very big problem brought about by Canadians themselves. And, no, it's not different this time, as it is never different when the fundamentals of demand are de-linked from the valuation of the underlying assets fueled by cheap money and excessive leverage. Higher taxes and lower disposable incomes at a personal level won't help either when the ultimate de-leveraging of the Canadian consumer occurs which it has to, as the current levels are unsustainable for the country's long term economic growth.

Mounties. Sugar juice from trees.
 
Back
Top Bottom