BBC licence fee could be means tested everyone pays regardless of whether or not they own a telev

IIRC Radio 1 does things like new bands, and has a vast playlist compared to the commercial stations.
There is a report that compared the number of unique artists, unique tracks, and how often each track was played.

It turned out that R1 played something like 2-3 times as many unique tracks in any one month (at least), and had far less repeats of even the most common track than the commercial broadcasters.
It explained why every time I turn Heart on I seemed to get the same tracks from the 80's and 90's within short order ;)

R2 is slightly older radio that combines music with speech.

Then you've got the local stations.

Most of the commercial radio stations in the UK no longer do any real speech, and even where they are meant to do local news they rarely actually have much more than the most barebones, and often their local offices might only be open a few hours a day with most of the playout and presentation either common across the network or recorded in advance.

Could any of the above be done on a commercial basis, i.e. supported by adverts? I'm thinking primarily Radio1 here.
 
If the BBC did try to get this through, it would be just another reason that I would consider moving to a country that doesn't force you to pay so someone can listen to the radio on the way to work. Apparently graduates and young skilled workers are leaving the country lots and its a problem. What a shame, maybe they should make this place more compelling then.
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;28326493 said:
Advertising supported commercial radio is awful.

My girlfriend listens to an assortment of commercial radio stations. They make me want to beat my head on the dashboard after about 15 minutes.
 
Stop bashing the freeman movement, they are the ones standing up for YOUR rights. Secondly they are not conspiracy theorists so don't get them mixed up with the likes of David Icke and Alex Jones. Lastly, wouldn't you consider what you call "normal people" who bend over and take it up the ******* by government and corporations, to be the mental ones?
The Freeman movement is utter tosh.
 
The arguement for Sky being crap because of adverts is such a moot point, since this is 2015 not 1997, I wonder why anyone watched live tv these days. Everything I watch is recorded, most of everything I view is through "planner" and quick 10sec blast of forward and I have missed all adverts.

I happily watch things in bulk, wait a few days and watch some more. I record whole weeks of Wheeler dealers whilst induldging in other series and then go back to them a few days later.
 
You got a link to that, or was the "shill account" contract in relation to say "social media" - which would cover someone whose job involved for example posting to an official face book page, updating twitter and appearing on forums with a big "Official rep" or similar badge :)

I ask as I remember seeing someone taking a job advert that mentioned social media as a sign that the BBC had large numbers of people posting undercover on forums (It was either a BBC advert, or a TVL advert for a CS job that included social meida), as opposed to it being a fairly standard part of the job description for a lot of customer service and PR bods now as they're the ones who tend to run official facebook pages etc, in addition to the more traditional duties they used to have such as answering the phone or letters, then they added answering emails when email became common. Now they tend to use the term social media as that's easier than saying "Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus, Myspace, Friendster, myFriendface".

I used to know the company name, but I've forgotten now. They were paid to spam forum posts that criticise the BBC. Digital Spy forum was comedy gold, several people used to use the same login, and they'd occasionally forget which login they were posting from and end up arguing with themselves!

Doesn't surprise me the BBC still employ Shills.
 
This is like paying car insurance and not even owning a car or better yet paying cinema ticket prices and never going to the cinema just because some fat hand shaker says so.

This country needs a good shake up.
 
This is like paying car insurance and not even owning a car or better yet paying cinema ticket prices and never going to the cinema just because some fat hand shaker says so.

This country needs a good shake up.

Don't worry, this is just the death throes of a dying organisation. Trying to cling on to dear life by any means possible.

Any forced funding of the BBC will be easy to get rid of by the government in 10 - 20 years time as there will be no one watching it apart from old fuddy duddies. It will be an easy vote winner.
 
If the BBC did try to get this through, it would be just another reason that I would consider moving to a country that doesn't force you to pay so someone can listen to the radio on the way to work. Apparently graduates and young skilled workers are leaving the country lots and its a problem. What a shame, maybe they should make this place more compelling then.

You'd move countries to avoid paying ~£150 a year for something you use? What country do you have in mind out of interest, or have you not thought that far ahead?
 
You'd move countries to avoid paying ~£150 a year for something you use? What country do you have in mind out of interest, or have you not thought that far ahead?

If BBC's services are used fair enough but the majority of people I know do not use any services from the BBC, Making this a must pay thing otherwise it's court and fine time is just making England look more and more like a police state.
 
2 Television licences around the world
2.1 Europe
2.1.1 Albania
2.1.2 Austria
2.1.3 Belgium (Walloon Region and Brussels Region)
2.1.4 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2.1.5 Croatia
2.1.6 Czech Republic
2.1.7 Denmark
2.1.8 Finland
2.1.9 France
2.1.10 Germany
2.1.11 Greece
2.1.12 Ireland
2.1.13 Italy
2.1.14 Macedonia
2.1.15 Montenegro
2.1.16 Norway
2.1.17 Poland
2.1.18 Romania
2.1.19 Serbia
2.1.20 Slovakia
2.1.21 Slovenia
2.1.22 Sweden
2.1.23 Switzerland
2.1.24 Turkey
2.1.25 United Kingdom
2.2 Asia
2.2.1 Israel
2.2.2 Japan
2.2.3 Pakistan
2.2.4 South Korea
2.3 Africa
2.3.1 Ghana
2.3.2 Mauritius
2.3.3 Namibia
2.3.4 South Africa
 
I'm from Germany and literally no one pays the TV license, It's seen as a joke.

A larger % here evade the license fee than in Germany.

From TV Licensing -

Poland - 65%
Italy - 26%
Ireland - 12%
Sweden - 12%
Norway - 9%
United Kingdom - 5%
Austria - 3%
 
Probably why the BBC is world famous and no one even knows what German state TV is?

TV is unimportant to a lot of people in Germany, We're happy being the power house of Europe rather than having a well known TV station ;)

A larger % here evade the license fee than in Germany.

From TV Licensing -

Poland - 65%
Italy - 26%
Ireland - 12%
Sweden - 12%
Norway - 9%
United Kingdom - 5%
Austria - 3%

Is that avoid or pay, Doesn't say, If it's only 5% avoidance then that's not exactly a lot.

As said, No one I know pays the TV license in Germany, Everyone I know in England pays it with 1 or 2 exceptions.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom