The Gentleman's Undergarment: Tight vs. Loose

Participant · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:29

What do the 'members' of OcUK prefer to sport downstairs? Tight or loose?

I've always been a boxer man personally. I can't stand the feeling of tight underwear.

I've tried briefs / trunks and they always ride up my leg. I'd rather have little Participant flopping about and run the increased risk of a wedgie, than have the feeling of legs riding up my thigh and reduce blood flow to my plums.

Maybe we should put it to a 'pole'

.

Tephnos · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:30

Boxers, gotta let the air flow.

DIABLO · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:31

I wear boxer briefs which are like in the middle, some support but not tight.

arknor · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:31

boxers was a 90s thing and I never changed.

I couldn't do tight underwear and sweaty balls, I get that when I wear cycling shorts. I certainly wouldn't want it all the time.

also my member is bigger than the average so I would likely need to keep repositioning it to be comfortable or to stop it rubbing against my leg and getting excited.

I did buy some boxer briefs for the bedroom but meh

John40 · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:31

No pants at all like the air between by bits.

Jonny2284 · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:33

Boxer briefs.

Spook187 · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:33

You missed the one about not wearing any underwear, seems a lot in the older generation.

savagesam117 · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:35

I like tight around the leg and then loose, get to let him have his space!

Rroff · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:36

Somewhere inbetween - I like a bit of support but not tight (usually wear boxers/hipsters depending on style/fit).

John40 · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:36

Spook187 said:
You missed the one about not wearing any underwear, seems a lot in the older generation.

Can't see the point of pants to be honest, as long as you're not wearing a kilt or a cross dressing weirdo you don't need them and also they're definitely not healthy.

Jono8 · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:39

DIABLO said:
I wear boxer briefs which are like in the middle, some support but not tight.

This

lafemmefatale · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:45

Boxer shorts are super comfortable. I have a couple of pairs for lounging around in.

PapaLazaru · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:45

Briefs. Nice cupping action.

OhEsEcks · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:54

Long Johns.

adam98150 · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:56

John40 said:
Can't see the point of pants to be honest, as long as you're not wearing a kilt or a cross dressing weirdo you don't need them and also they're definitely not healthy.

To separate your *** and **** from your trousers maybe? And the outline is a lot more graphic if you're not wearing anything underneath.

Don't wear any at home though. Just wear shorts or joggers and let it hang.

Feef · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:58

In before mankini.

Boxers here, I walk 15-20km a day in jeans, and it rarely drops below 30c, so I can do without the chafing.

Uther · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:58

John40 said:
Can't see the point of pants to be honest, as long as you're not wearing a kilt or a cross dressing weirdo you don't need them and also they're definitely not healthy.

Wearing a kilt is when you don't wear them!

thep02 · 26 Jul 2015 at 20:58

Third way.

John40 · 26 Jul 2015 at 21:00

adam98150 said:
To separate your *** and **** from your trousers maybe? And the outline is a lot more graphic if you're not wearing anything underneath.

Don't where any at home though. Just wear shorts or joggers and let it hang.

the argument that you need fabric between **** and trousers is stupid because why not also have a fabric between **** and pants where does it end.

The doctor on the telly said no pants is the way to go so I did.

lafemmefatale · 26 Jul 2015 at 21:00

OhEsEcks said:
Long Johns.

Daddy