According to my 320d (2005) I get 50+ on the motorway so I don't see why you couldn't 50 out of 1 series?
I used to get 60 combined in my 320d and I'm very heavy on the accelerator
[TW]Fox;28364833 said:No you didn't - I can only assume you've got the wrong definition of combined. Heck even the ridiculous NEDC figures didn't suggest you could get 60mpg combined out of an M47 engined E90!
60 combined would require well over 70mpg on long easy cruises to offset the town work!?
[TW]Fox;28364973 said:We are talking about 2005-2007 x20d's in this thread.
What are you talking about?
The only E90 that ever had a combined of 68 was the specific 320d ED company car tax dodge model, which nobody in this thread is talking about, it was much newer for a start.
I used to get 60 combined in my 320d and I'm very heavy on the accelerator so totally agree that it's doable. Mine was a 2011 model though so had the newer engine which helps explain some of the difference between our values.
Even so the stats from the ED models are good but some way off their quoted values. I have a late 2010 320d EfficientDynamics and my average is 55mpg. Pretty much every journey I do is a long trip which is mostly motorway.
Best I've ever done is 825 miles out of the 61 litre tank. That comes out to 61mpg and that was doing long drives pretty much entirely motorway and driving at 70 the whole way with only myself in the car. Don't see how it's possible to get much more than that unless you trundle along at 60.
Diesel is 6p cheaper than petrol?
Tbf i use to get 60mpg average out of my 320d (f30 efficientdynamics), but my typical route lends itself to better mpg. I get 38-40mpg on the same route from an mx5 for example.[TW]Fox;28364833 said:No you didn't - I can only assume you've got the wrong definition of combined. Heck even the ridiculous NEDC figures didn't suggest you could get 60mpg combined out of an M47 engined E90!
60 combined would require well over 70mpg on long easy cruises to offset the town work!?
[TW]Fox;28365032 said:Some 2007 1 Series have the N47, some have the M47.
But even the N57 120d was not 68mpg combined - it is 58mpg, and under simulated test conditions (Which given that its a lighter car than a 320d ED demonstrates quite how much tweaking the ED underwent!)
I have driven loads of 118d, 120d, 318d and 320d and not a single one of them has ever properly averaged more than about 55-58mpg over a long journey.
A combined of 60 is just fantasy stuff.
I used to get 60 combined in my 320d and I'm very heavy on the accelerator so totally agree that it's doable. Mine was a 2011 model though so had the newer engine which helps explain some of the difference between our values.
Bit of a threadomancy here but i've got one of these currently and struggle to get above 48.7mpg
( |-| |2 ][ $;28365178 said:Then from the link you just posted?
I'm confused?