• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming Edition 8192MB GDDR5 PCI-Express Graphics Card x2 ?

I would recommend the 390 over the 390X considering you are buying new. It will save you £150 and you will lose maybe 5 FPS. 390X really isn't worth it imo. For example in the witcher 3 1440p ultra settings

SFOuTsb.png


1 FPS isnt worth 20% more cost imo :D

Upgrading from 7970's would be a nice performance boost though. Between 20-50% faster depending on the res and what game you play.

I can (almost) max everything at 4k 60 FPS with my 2 290's, so you should notice a good difference :)
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the feedback guys ... as always with this forum super fast responses and to the point.

£160 difference between two 390 and 390X atm
 
Last edited:
Another question .... I am assuming we don't need active port converters for these new cards ? as I have 3 screens with 2 x HDMI & 1 x VGA and these cards have 2x Dual Link DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort so what's the best combination to connect with ?

2 x HDMI & 1 x HDMI to DVI ??

I will also follow up my GPU upgrade with a monitor upgrade a month or so later ... I was thinking of 3 x this Acer Predator XG270HUomidpx 27" FREESYNC

https://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MO-078-AC&groupid=17&catid=948

As long as thy will fit on my monitor stand.
 
Last edited:
Another question .... I am assuming we don't need active port converters for these new cards ? as I have 3 screens with 2 x HDMI & 1 x VGA and these cards have 2x Dual Link DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort so what's the best combination to connect with ?

2 x HDMI & 1 x HDMI to DVI ??

I will also follow up my GPU upgrade with a monitor upgrade a month or so later ... I was thinking of 3 x this Acer Predator XG270HUomidpx 27" FREESYNC

https://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MO-078-AC&groupid=17&catid=948

As long as thy will fit on my monitor stand.

AFAIK you do not need active adapters with hawaii. I was running 2 DVI and 1 HDMI for quite a while.
Depending on what game you play you may struggle with 3 of those monitors and only 2 390s. 3 x 2560 x 1440 is 11 million pixels, compared to the 8.2 million of 4K, thats a 25% increase. If you don't play anything incredibly demanding you will be ok, but don't expect the witcher 3 at maximum settings at 60 fps.

Like I said I get around 60 FPS in BF4 with all details maxed apart from AA deferred which is 2x and AA post which is off. Thats at 4k. Pixels don't scale to performance exactly, but to be safe, expect about a 20% performance drop from my results for those 3 monitors.
 
Last edited:
AFAIK you do not need active adapters with hawaii. I was running 2 DVI and 1 HDMI for quite a while.
Depending on what game you play you may struggle with 3 of those monitors and only 2 390s. 3 x 2560 x 1440 is 11 million pixels, compared to the 8.2 million of 4K, thats a 25% increase. If you don't play anything incredibly demanding you will be ok, but don't expect the witcher 3 at maximum settings at 60 fps.

Like I said I get around 60 FPS in BF4 with all details maxed apart from AA deferred which is 2x and AA post which is off. Thats at 4k. Pixels don't scale to performance exactly, but to be safe, expect about a 20% performance drop from my results for those 3 monitors.

Ok thanks for that ... I will look at some other monitors, I do want ones with very narrow edges so I may have to wait until one comes along ??
 
Ok its been a while since I replaced something and I have been looking at GPU's for a while I am thinking of swapping my 2 7970's for 2 R9 390X's I am looking at this

MSI Radeon R9 390X Gaming Edition 8192MB GDDR5 PCI-Express Graphics Card

https://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=GX-288-MS&groupid=701&catid=56&subcat=3059

let me know what you think....

Cracking card. 390X is faster, though some say it's not worth the premium over the 390. IMO it is worth it, it's a cracking card that will last you a long time with it's 8GB VRAM :)
 
A good combo and great cards BUT I'd be inclined personally to go for a Fury then add another later on (although the vRam is a slight issue).

I really don't know at the moment, it's not a great time to buy anything tbh! I've only bought my 2 'cause I'm a nutter :D :p

Single Ti no good? Something like the Amp Extreme would probably perform the same/similarly as the 390's in Crossfire...

These numbers are insane;

http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/84722-zotac-geforce-gtx-980-ti-amp-extreme/
 
I wouldn't normally recommend Crossfire, but you're coming from that so you're obviously happy with how it's worked out.

The 390x will have more grunt for when the game doesn't have an XF profile, but most of the time the performance would be quite close to 390's in XF considering the price difference.

So I'd go for 390's instead, or an air-cooled Fury as an alternative pick.
 
Thanks guys .... I am happy with crossfire the only thing I want to fix is the odd bit of screen tearing so ill be picking up at some point 3 x FREESYNC monitors.

I will need help with this as I don't want to buy monitors that undo the card performance so are 3 1440 FREESYNC monitors realistic with these two cards ??
 
Thanks guys .... I am happy with crossfire the only thing I want to fix is the odd bit of screen tearing so ill be picking up at some point 3 x FREESYNC monitors.

I will need help with this as I don't want to buy monitors that undo the card performance so are 3 1440 FREESYNC monitors realistic with these two cards ??

Yes, as long as you don't want witcher 3 at ultra at 60 fps, it's totally realistic. This is an enthusiast forum so people here will shoot me down for this, saying you NEED like 15 980Ti's just to play at 1280 x 1024.

But if you are willing to turn down a couple of settings, you should be ok for 60 fps in most titles with those 2 cards. It's only really things like GTAV, TW3, Project cars *shudders*, Metro Last Light, Crysis 3 that you won't be able to max out. In that case, just turn AA down as low as you can stomach (for me at 4k, thats actually off entirely, but on 1440p monitors I would go 2x), and some effects such as ambient occlusion can be turned down without much visual impact at all due to the high resolution (just because of the way those effects work). Everything else should be grand.

Crossfire scaling with XDMA is incredibly good, better than SLI for sure, but its still multi-GPU. If you are ok with than then ok, but otherwise...

You may want to consider a 980Ti. It will perform better in games that don't scale well, but won't perform as well in games that do. Around a similar price too, and its a single card.

OR, A single air cooled fury. That won't perform as well as a 980ti or 2 390s. But its quite a bit cheaper than both, and in high resolutions the Fury (and fury x) are very similar to the 980Ti in performance. Might be worth grabbing one, seeing if its enough, if not, get another. See here http://www.anandtech.com/show/9421/the-amd-radeon-r9-fury-review-feat-sapphire-asus/8
Not sure how the 4GB would handle 3x2560x1440 though... At 4k its fine in my experience, and thats 4GB of GDDR5 so... idk.

P.S. if you read the review above completely ignore the ASUS STRIX DUCIII Fury (or the DUCIII 390X). The DUCIII cooler is just as bad (if not worse) than the old DUCII cooler on AMD cards, a completely terrible design made to look flashy but performs like arse. 2 of the heatpipes don't even touch again! (Spoiler as huge image)
AS7V17111.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thanks guys .... I am happy with crossfire the only thing I want to fix is the odd bit of screen tearing so ill be picking up at some point 3 x FREESYNC monitors.

I will need help with this as I don't want to buy monitors that undo the card performance so are 3 1440 FREESYNC monitors realistic with these two cards ??

3 x 1440p will be tough to drive, I think those cards would struggle on modern games without a fair bit of modesty in the settings. You'd be very reliant on good Crossfire profiles I think.

You could start with one powerful card and 1 G/Freesync monitor then grow as needed, just an option.
 
3 x 1440p will be tough to drive, I think those cards would struggle on modern games without a fair bit of modesty in the settings. You'd be very reliant on good Crossfire profiles I think.

You could start with one powerful card and 1 G/Freesync monitor then grow as needed, just an option.

Agreed, modern games seem to monster even the latest top gpu's even at 1440p fully maxed!!! A 34" Widescreen (3440x1440) not an option? Used to love mine and filled my vision perfectly :) :cool:
 
Back
Top Bottom