Newcastle mass murder plot - no terrorism ere mate

didn't have to show any sort of sympathy to get hassled. you only had to have a certain accent and be of a certain religion. but that's a conversation for a different time and different thread!

Yes it is and I was alluding to that very mechanic we see at play now. We don't see that rubbish now but then we don't see some highly veiled sympathies either do we.
 
Yes it is and I was alluding to that very mechanic we see at play now. We don't see that rubbish now but then we don't see some highly veiled sympathies either do we.

I think you mean the very thinly veiled sympathies we are seeing ;) so thinly veiled they are almost totally transparent!
 
I've been saying it for years - The term terrorist is exclusively used for muslims by the mainstream media these days, guess it must just be me eh?:

http://stopwar.org.uk/news/how-corr...nising-muslims-is-a-recipe-for-radicalisation

Another word we have been used to hearing every day of the week is “terrorist” and “terrorism”. A terrorist is always a Muslim, and never described as such if others commit similar crimes and worse. The media deliberately avoid referring them as terrorists and their religion is never mentioned.

Obviously, Muslims take note of this duplicitous policy. This openly discriminatory behaviour is also found to be leading to radicalisation.

As for those pathetic ramblings about me being 'of concern', you don't know me, and don't pretend as if you do. Bet I do more for our country than most of you keyboard warriors.
 
Last edited:
I've been saying it for years - The term terrorist is exclusively used for muslims by the mainstream media these days, guess it must just be me:

http://stopwar.org.uk/news/how-corr...nising-muslims-is-a-recipe-for-radicalisation


IRA are Muslims now?

two from this year:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/ira-plotted-bomb-prince-charles-5699813

IRA terrorists had plotted to line the route of Prince Charles and Camilla’s tour through Ireland with bombs in a cynical bid to make sure the royal couple would not escape being hit, sources have revealed.

http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/s...lot-on-game-of-thrones-film-set-31052002.html
Republican terrorists planned to leave a bomb next to a catering unit at the Paint Hall Titanic Studios where former cops, who were working on the set of the hit HBO show, were gathering for meals.


nope... zoomee is just making things up again...
 
I've been saying it for years - The term terrorist is exclusively used for muslims by the mainstream media these days, guess it must just be me eh?:

http://stopwar.org.uk/news/how-corr...nising-muslims-is-a-recipe-for-radicalisation



As for those pathetic ramblings about me being 'of concern', you don't know me, and don't pretend as if you do. Bet I do more for our country than most of you.

Nope, it's just you. As we've seen we have an Israeli jew being called a terrorist. We've had the IRA being called terrorists. Brevik being called a terrorist.
The trouble is muslims carry out so many terror attacks they dwarf the rest by comparison.
 
I've been saying it for years - The term terrorist is exclusively used for muslims by the mainstream media these days, guess it must just be me eh?:

http://stopwar.org.uk/news/how-corr...nising-muslims-is-a-recipe-for-radicalisation



As for those pathetic ramblings about me being 'of concern', you don't know me, and don't pretend as if you do. Bet I do more for our country than most of you keyboard warriors.

this is getting boring now. catch yourself on and stop talking nonsense. the correct use of the word has been described to you on numerous occasions and you are steadfastly ignoring them and pushing your own agenda it seems.

good for you that you've been saying it for years, doesn't make it true. and to say the term is used exclusively for muslims is one of the most frighteningly stupid things I've heard in a long time
 
I've been saying it for years - The term terrorist is exclusively used for muslims by the mainstream media these days, guess it must just be me eh?:

http://stopwar.org.uk/news/how-corr...nising-muslims-is-a-recipe-for-radicalisation

So you've found a site wrote by a friend of yours or somebody with the same ideology - so what, it doesn't make it correct?

Study Says White Extremists Have Killed More Americans in the U.S. Than Jihadists Since 9/11

http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/
 
So you've found a site wrote by a friend of yours or somebody with the same ideology - so what, it doesn't make it correct?

Study Says White Extremists Have Killed More Americans in the U.S. Than Jihadists Since 9/11

http://time.com/3934980/right-wing-extremists-white-terrorism-islamist-jihadi-dangerous/

i like how thye have to exclude 9/11 48 killed by "white" terrorists compared to the 20 something by Islamic terrorists!!!

as long as we ignore the 4,000 killed by Islamic terrorists in the year befroe ¬_¬

so in a bit over a thousand years at this current rate white terrorists will equal the Islamic ones....

assuming no more islamic killings of course.
 
i like how thye have to exclude 9/11 48 killed by "white" terrorists compared to the 20 something by Islamic terrorists!!!

as long as we ignore the 4,000 killed by Islamic terrorists in the year befroe ¬_¬

so in a bit over a thousand years at this current rate white terrorists will equal the Islamic ones....

assuming no more islamic killings of course.

But what if those 4,000 were killed by white terrorists?
Oh noes, I said it, tin foil over there.
 
Can you link me to that specific page please?

Oh look what a surprise, he neglected to actually say what it does say

https://www.mi5.gov.uk/home/about-us/what-we-do/the-threats/terrorism.html
Terrorism presents a serious and sustained threat to the United Kingdom and UK interests abroad. Terrorist groups seek to cause widespread disruption, fear and intimidation. They use violence or the threat of violence as a means of publicising their causes, motivating those who might be sympathetic to them and intimidating those who do not sympathise. They often aim to influence government policies and they often reject existing democratic processes, or even democracy itself, as a means of achieving their objectives. Although there is no generally agreed definition of terrorism internationally, in the UK the Terrorism Act 2000 defines terrorism as:

The use or threat of action designed to influence the government or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public, or a section of the public; made for the purposes of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause; and it involves or causes:•serious violence against a person;
•serious damage to a property;
•a threat to a person's life;
•a serious risk to the health and safety of the public; or
•serious interference with or disruption to an electronic system."

This nut job wasn't part of a group, wasn't using violence as motivation for those sympathetic to his non existent cause. Etc.
 
If our government is so bad for persecuting Muslims in this country - why are there so many Muslims camped in Calais trying desperately to get into the UK?
 
Back
Top Bottom