No its not, because the Titan X is superior to all other cards. It just has a premium price attached to it.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Nvidia's gaming chips drive surprise rise in revenue
- Thread starter Gregster
- Start date
No its not, because the Titan X is superior to all other cards. It just has a premium price attached to it.
Honestly, I jumped on a Titan X. If my card wasn't DOA and the RMA wasn't a joke I'd have still had one. Instead I got two 980Ti's for a little bit extra. Both of which I would have forgone for two Fury X's if they launched sooner.
It was all timing for me and when I was getting my system up and running. My previous cards were AMD ones and I'd have use them again.
I think NV's rise is both because of their current strong line up, and because AMD's Fiji launch was a mess. The cards themselves are great, but there are manufacturing issues with those darn pumps, and lack of supply.
It was all timing for me and when I was getting my system up and running. My previous cards were AMD ones and I'd have use them again.
I think NV's rise is both because of their current strong line up, and because AMD's Fiji launch was a mess. The cards themselves are great, but there are manufacturing issues with those darn pumps, and lack of supply.
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 4,504
- Location
- Wales
Honestly, I jumped on a Titan X. If my card wasn't DOA and the RMA wasn't a joke I'd have still had one. Instead I got two 980Ti's for a little bit extra. Both of which I would have forgone for two Fury X's if they launched sooner.
It was all timing for me and when I was getting my system up and running. My previous cards were AMD ones and I'd have use them again.
I think NV's rise is both because of their current strong line up, and because AMD's Fiji launch was a mess. The cards themselves are great, but there are manufacturing issues with those darn pumps, and lack of supply.
+1, AMD really have wreaked it with they Fury X launch, just terrible, which is a shame because the actual card, if you can get one without the whine is fantastic, cool quiet and as fast as a 980Ti.
But i must say i think nvidia's revenue results are well deserved, they've launched some brilliant cards and had very little issues, the 980 SC's that i had are still the best all round graphics card package i've ever used.
What i don't what though is for AMD to fall behind further, Fury X on DX12 and windows 10 is awesome, need to sort this Fury X launch business out and just move on, get their heads down, i want to see a full on battle between team green and red, pushing the limits which will benefit us all.
Reference 980Ti is only a little slower, and custom versions are faster.
But have half the VRAM.
VRAM quantity is only important insofar as it improves performance. The 980Ti's 6GB is already plenty.