Let me fix those typos for you.
All sorted, you're welcome![]()
Oh lordy, we have a bite.
Let's see you come up with something to back up the tripe you're spewing![]()
Congrats on being successfully trolled, gents.
Let me fix those typos for you.
All sorted, you're welcome![]()
Oh lordy, we have a bite.
Let's see you come up with something to back up the tripe you're spewing![]()
Congrats on being successfully trolled, gents.
Because that technology to do that hasn't been invented yet.
The set would be an exact replica of a part of the moon (not yet photographed) and the size of Chester, I think somebody may have noticed the Americans building that in the desert (plus the winds on earth would ruin everything).
Not to mention the affects of lunar mavity are practically impossible to reproduce convincingly on earth for the duration demonstrated in the videos.
I know for a fact that no human has been higher than 400 miles above earth's surface. I also know for a fact that nasa is a fraud.
Defending the moon landing is no worse then those defending the hoax. IMO we don't have clear cut evidence to suggest 100% that the landing happened without casting any doubt. If we did, everyone would accept this as truth.
Even if i showed you evidence you won't believe it. Even once NASA is closed down because of the past and present fraud's people will still believe they went to the moon lol
[FnG]magnolia;28438397 said:Your dedication and unswerving looniness are only two of the reasons that you are a forums gold standard poster
Never change, champ.
p.s. Did you ever get a date with that Pret a Manger server who had to change branch location because you were bothering her so much?
[FnG]magnolia;28438414 said:Is that the Bruce Willis one? Cracking sound track.
Defending the moon landing is no worse then those defending the hoax. IMO we don't have clear cut evidence to suggest 100% that the landing happened without casting any doubt. If we did, everyone would accept this as truth.
What on earth are you on about?
People say the same about Evolution, yet we know its true.... because of the evidence we have.
What on earth are you on about?
People say the same about Evolution, yet we know its true.... because of the evidence we have.
Another example: We know 9/11 was carried out by 19 middle eastern men, yet thousands believe it was a conspiracy carried out by the US governement, so because lots of people think that we should say 'Oooh who knows then'?
Your point is really really silly.
And this isn't possible?
Who is to say this was filmed outside in the first place?
Also if we had never been to the moon before, how do you know that everything acted exactly how it would have done on the moon?
I'm not saying they didn't go to the moon but, I also think it is a possibility that they didn't go on that occasion.
Defending the moon landing is no worse then those defending the hoax.
IMO we don't have clear cut evidence to suggest 100% that the landing happened without casting any doubt.
If we did, everyone would accept this as truth.
EDIT: Not getting into 9/11 and I too have suspicions on that. Sure they carried the attacks out, but other things also don't add up to say the Gov wasn't involved in some way or another.
These threads always end the same where those who follow the alternative view seek to elevate their own understanding because they spent more time researching on the Internet and are more logical because they doubt everything. Most WILL grow out of it and look back and laugh at their own beliefs because most do and those that don't tend to be lonely or emotionally contrary in their personalities.
Yea but arguments are never something to conclude anything so are pointless points to try and refute, a waste of energy and constantly batting out the "you can't PROVE it" is a clear example of yea but arguments.
Even if i showed you evidence you won't believe it. Even once NASA is closed down because of the past and present fraud's people will still believe they went to the moon lol