Why on earth would you remove murders when looking at rates of violence?
to look at other forms of violence
Also you're assuming that if firearms weren't available then no violence would occur.
no I've not assumed that
Why on earth would you remove murders when looking at rates of violence?
Also you're assuming that if firearms weren't available then no violence would occur.
If you remove murders? What?
the UK is one of the most violent countries in the western world
the UK is one of the most violent countries in the western world
No. It's one of the most open at reporting figures though!
...if you remove murders...LOL
actually overall it is anyway, including murders
tis just higher for everything else compared to the US, but also rather high for murders compared with other european countries
He's got it wrong anyway, it isn't 10 per 100,000, it's more like 3.
He's talking about violence. Presumably things like violent crime, domestic abuse and such. Removing murders by firearm may show that the UK is more violent than the US. Just another way of manipulating statistics.
that probably is a factor, though the differences do seem to be rather large
Due to fundamental differences in how crime is recorded and categorized, it’s impossible to compute exactly what the British violent crime rate would be if it were calculated the way the FBI does it, but if we must compare the two, my best estimate‡ would be something like 776 violent crimes per 100,000 people. While this is still substantially higher than the rate in the United States, it’s nowhere near the 2,034 cited by Swann and the Mail.
While it becomes clear that certain types of offenses are marginally higher in the UK than in the US (robbery and knife crime being more likely in the UK by an order of 1.1x and 1.27x respectively) a number of other, more serious offenses, are both marginally and substantially higher in the US. Rape of a female is 1.02x more likely in the US, while theft of a vehicle is 1.29x more likely. More disturbingly, burglary is significantly higher at 1.52x more likely to occur in the US. However, it is at the considerably more, well, violent crimes that America really supersedes England and Wales into its own class. In the United States, you are 6.9x more likely to be the victim of aggravated assault resulting in serious injury than in the UK. You are 4.03x more likely to be murdered than in the UK. And more staggeringly (though not surprising) you are 35.2x more likely to be shot dead in the Unites States than in the UK. Before anybody asks, no, these do not take into account justifiable homicide and other “acceptable shootings”, nor do murders for that matter:
I stated the fire-arm death rate which is 10.64 per 100k in the US at the last count.....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_firearm-related_death_rate
The site I posted makes it a lot closer (their methodology is there too)...
6.7 of which is accounted for by suicide.