The EU Migrant Crisis

Status
Not open for further replies.
This thread is amazing,

"OMG you can't agree with a poll of 422k becuase its all over one picture"

"OMG look at all these criminals in this ONE video i've found, theyre definitely all like that"
 
I think it's a fairly reasonable approach.



Germany is going to pull the whole of Europe into this one, and that is why I now agree the UK should leave the EU. Enough is enough. It won't just affect Germany. Not by a long shot.

I don't agree we should leave the EU, but I do agree that Germany is being incredibly irresponsible in its response to the crisis.

In a few months time when the media buzz surround helping refugees has faded, they are going to be left with one hell of a problem.
 
Last edited:
I envisage a number of terrorist attacks in Europe in the not to distant future.

Why don't they go to Russia, no they want the cushty countries.
 
I envisage a number of terrorist attacks in Europe in the not to distant future.

Why don't they go to Russia, no they want the cushty countries.

Even better question - why oil rich muslim countries don't want their own either? Because they probably know best.

Because russia is literally one of the most racist countries on earth perhaps?

Agree.
 
Last edited:
I think Australia is like that? correct me if I'm wrong but if you're caught committing crime in first few years you're out. Might be aus... or somewhere else but it was something like that.

I agree with that.

Any kind of violent crime, fraud or theft (basically anything beyond a speeding ticket) then you're put on an army transport and dropped back of at your country of origin.
 
Your assumption is incorrect. The first reason why migrants don't bother with Slovakia is that it is much poorer than UK, GER etc. and therefore there are no insane handouts waiting for them. Another reason is that for many of us (I happen to be a Slovakian, too) their culture is in absolute contrast with our culture and way of life. We don't see any point having our country saturated with the communities not willing to integrate (by this I mean respecting our law, culture and freedom). And last but not least - although sounding like an oxymoron, Slovakia has a large gypsy minority that many Slovaks see as a big problem, mainly because it is anti-social, messy and largely on the dole. So why would we want to have more "different" people coming to abuse the system, cause trouble or both?

As for Schengen, what's the point having it if we open the gates for uncontrollable mass migration? How do we manage to check all of those people potentially carrying various diseases or rule out they are not a security threat to us? We just don't and that's why the whole thing is wrong. The EU socialist establishment has completely failed (as socialists always do) to make sure our borders are safe and secure.

To sum it up - if Germany, Austria, Sweden etc. want tens of thousands immigrants coming to their countries it is their business. But do not force other countries to fulfill your stupid, out of thin air created quotas on immigrants thinking you have come up with some genius idea to sort out your mess.

Well said.
 
This thread is amazing,

"OMG you can't agree with a poll of 422k becuase its all over one picture"

"OMG look at all these criminals in this ONE video i've found, theyre definitely all like that"

Nope! Not one single person has reacted like that, we just discussing the implications of over exposing our society to immigrants of different cultural values and religions. ;)

They do not mix with us period and the ones that do are treated with suspicion by there own people. :eek:

Norfolk need I say more, the ivory tower brigade. :rolleyes:
 
But the problem is they don't integrate at all. Ok I am not expecting them to eat bacon and drink alcohol, just you know live how we live-ish.

Not far from me a road Lodge lane is like the middle east. We don't mix at all and never ever will

Posted by yourself, I suppose that video and your limited experience with muslims sums up an entire region of people does it? Cos my experience is vastly different.


You cannot teach stupid its a fact. :rolleyes:

Quite, you can also not encourage it to read facts, attempt to understand a viewpoint or even most of the time just stop being an ass.


Norfolk need I say more, the ivory tower brigade.

and there we go, because I dont agree with your prejudiced viewpoint you just resort to a veiled insult, A) I'm not from norfolk I just live there now and B) Its got one of the largest Lithuanian and Polish immigrant rate in the local town.
 
Last edited:
Even better question - why oil rich muslim countries don't want their own either? Because they probably know best

Perhaps you already know this, but I only found out recently. I just pulled these from wikipedia after hearing about it.

In kuwait only 30% of the population are Kuwaiti
In the UAE only 17% of the population are Emirati
In Bahrain only 40% of the population are Bahraini

These places are built and ran on what is effectively slave migrant labour
 
This thread is amazing,

"OMG you can't agree with a poll of 422k becuase its all over one picture"

"OMG look at all these criminals in this ONE video i've found, theyre definitely all like that"

Don't be silly.

You know there have been countless threads, headlines and articles written on the nature of muslim immigration into the EU. You think we're basing everything on that Swedish video? Of course not. It is simply more evidence to add to the pile; evidence that so far the multi-culti dream is failing. It has not delivered a society of people from all backgrounds that identify as British.

Instead it has delivered segregation, and a sub-society of people who live here but don't actually identify with us - even to the point of disliking us! You think we're racist, but do you speak to the muslims living here who think we are dogs?

And you can't seriously be denying that the media whipped up a storm around those photos, because we all saw it with our own eyes. The media absolutely has the power to shape public opinion, and is often selective in its reporting to suit its own agenda.
 
The media absolutely has the power to shape public opinion, and is often selective in its reporting to suit its own agenda.

The is definitely some sort of a agenda going on the has to be, people are breaking the law and getting away with it.

If it carries on this way I might have to get a tub of kiwi and go robbing vans with a Stanley down south. :p
 
Athletic bodies, mobile phones, sunglasses, nice clothes and a lot of money paid to smugglers to get here. Definitely refugees.

I noticed that too, oh these poor refugee's! Some of them look like **** fashion models waiting for the latest gig. Even saw one guy pull out an IPAD and a lady say she was going to spend the night in two 4 star hotels. No money eh? :rolleyes:
 
I noticed that too, oh these poor refugee's! Some of them look like **** fashion models waiting for the latest gig. Even saw one guy pull out an IPAD and a lady say she was going to spend the night in two 4 star hotels. No money eh? :rolleyes:

Since when did being a refugee mean you can't have nice clothes or possessions?
 
I agree with that.

Any kind of violent crime, fraud or theft (basically anything beyond a speeding ticket) then you're put on an army transport and dropped back of at your country of origin.

We get that enshrined in law, and it'll be a good first step. Safeguards are never a bad thing, and rushing into this without safeguards would be asking for trouble.

Currently as things stand, however, I do not believe we are allowed to get rid of these refugees very easily, certainly not deport them to their point of origin.

I know it sounds harsh and many of them - whilst not minded to integrate - may well be law abiding. But we absolutely need the power to come down like a ton of bricks on any refugee caught committing crimes here.

And the police have to be capable of going into these areas to investigate.

https://www.freemovement.org.uk/criminal-offences-and-refugee-status/

Ah, here we go. Only "particularly serious crime" is a grounds for deportation (and not to point of origin like Syria).

Court of Appeal decided theft or burglary was not serious enough; it basically has to be murder or manslaughter or posing a serious risk to society.

So, as is so typical, the "human rights" of criminal refugees trumps law and order.
 
Since when did being a refugee mean you can't have nice clothes or possessions?

As was pointed out, a genuine refugee does not mind living in a tent in a safe country.

These people wanted "saving" from the "bad conditions", because they were sharing a tent.

Oh, the humanity.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom