The EU Migrant Crisis

Status
Not open for further replies.
stuman said:
they are laughing at us. that's why. it's a troll.

well played Saudi Arabia, Well played.

goes a little something like this.....

SA: "hahahaha, you let how many in? without documents?! hahaha, (sarcastic)you're going to need some more mosques for them all(/sarcastic)! hahahaha"

GR: "please?"
Click to expand...


lol well said, its complete joke they are the biggest finances to the rebels, how about cut back on arms money and actually take in more refugees.
 
Narj said:
Next on the line would be the banning of Oktoberfest. Should that happen, we should declare war on them and take all their beer as spoils of victory. :p
Click to expand...

I was thinking this too. It's almost like there is a mandate to islamify the most beer guzzling, pork sausage eating country in the world. Convert the most 'reprehensible' country first then on to the next.
 
tis a bit nuts, Saudi funded mosques, schools etc.. don't have a good track record - they tend to lean towards the full retard part of the 'Islam' spectrum

presumably these mosques will only cater to the sunni refugees too
 
Boycey0211 said:
I wouldn't have said any of that was racist tbh



They're like pokemon itchy, gotta catch them all....
Click to expand...

I know what it was and it should be STD, as in sexually transmitted disease.
Not STI sexually transmitted infection. Although the same thing STD is the standard definition. Take it someone from the UK did not make that image.

On ****ing topic again. Madness I just want to walk away from this thread at the moment. Some of the replies are crazy, but hey that's people. The loving warm hearted animals we are. :rolleyes:

If you put 1,000 immigrants in with a town of 10,000 Christians do you think it could work?

As someone said and was directed at me, oil and water don't mix period so what you do?
Change the laws of physics ??? :confused:
 
What better way to force Islam on the world than to mass move the Islamic population to non-Islamic areas and then build infrastructure for them. Kinda like what the English did to the Scots or what Russia did\is doing to ex-soviet union states (Ukraine, Georgia, etc)

There's a reason why Islam does not take hold in China, Russia, South america etc, they see it as a hostile entity with those behind it having intent to both aggressively and 'peacefully' take over.
 
Ireheart said:
What better way to force Islam on the world than to mass move the Islamic population to non-Islamic areas and then build infrastructure for them. Kinda like what the English did to the Scots or what Russia did\is doing to ex-soviet union states (Ukraine, Georgia, etc)

There's a reason why Islam does not take hold in China, Russia, South america etc, they see it as a hostile entity with those behind it having intent to both aggressively and 'peacefully' take over.
Click to expand...

Well this is an interesting development: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/106943

Dunno about banning building but we should certainly close down mosques with proven links to extremism.

I do think the media spin is beginning to fail and a large number of the public are starting to revolt against it.
 
matdom said:
Saudi Arabia: Pledge to build 200 mosques for Syrian refugees in Germany

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/saudi-arabia-pledge-build-200-200729015.html#hm1RJwt

i'm telling you , you can not make this up wow money for mosques but no money for food shelter etc...
Click to expand...

In the UK Saudi Arabia has already done this, they sponsor and fund dozens of mosques in the UK and 100s already across Europe, many of which have been linked to terror.

What Saudi Arabia practice is not moderate either, they are Wahhabi, a similar sect to Salfi, which is what ISIS are. In short, this kind of Islam is the worst and them building mosques should be condemned and not allowed,even at a diplomatic level but hey, OIL and money talks and they have plenty of it, people don't care about the human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia.

Read about their religion there, see links on the side for direct links to the islamic sects:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant
 
itchy said:
I know what it was and it should be STD, as in sexually transmitted disease.
Not STI sexually transmitted infection. Although the same thing STD is the standard definition. Take it someone from the UK did not make that image.

On ****ing topic again. Madness I just want to walk away from this thread at the moment. Some of the replies are crazy, but hey that's people. The loving warm hearted animals we are. :rolleyes:

If you put 1,000 immigrants in with a town of 10,000 Christians do you think it could work?

As someone said and was directed at me, oil and water don't mix period so what you do?
Change the laws of physics ??? :confused:
Click to expand...

I'm no sociophysicist but I don't think people are actually oil and water.
 
itchy said:
So you think everyone on this planet should mingle and lose their cultural identity?

I like different cultures and identities it makes life exciting.
You go mixing it all up and that will be lost to history.

All you will be left with is a pudding bowl full of ****! :rolleyes:

Try making a nice cake with every different sweet on the planet in it?
Click to expand...

I got banned for 3 days for posting a picture mocking the mods in a thread titled "Draw A Picture Of The Mods", yet saying utterly disgusting and racist things like the above about mixed-raced people is allowed? :confused:
 
Can I just clear the water so to say.

I don't really want to get into religion, but you have to understand that peoples upbringing and views will be totally different.

I have no bother with other peoples religion or belief, I am ****ed off at how the minority of beliefs seem to get their own way.

I know what is going on and inside me wants to disbelieve it. But my guts are telling me something is wrong on so many levels. I feel sick and a little afraid.

There you go am a xenophobic **** bag! Got me bang to rights!

I digress ! :(
 
estebanrey said:
Wouldn't work, at least whilst we are subject to the ECHR. The infamous 'right to a family life' would be too easily invoked. Any children born to a refugee will be a British Citizen and therefore their parents couldn't be deported and any other family would claim the above and be able to stay also. Then of course there's marriages (genuine and sham) and illness.

BTW, I'm not some Daily Mail-reading, "don't let any foreigners in" type. Just pointing out why the idea of temporary fixture wouldn't work. The point is, how ever many we take, we have to accept a significant proportion of them will stay indefinitely and think about the consequences of that increase in population.
Click to expand...

As I read this - my mind was seeing the scenes from Macedonia border - seriously. Europe is in a SERIOUS situation and politicians are just talking the talk of someone who wants to stay in a job rather than making the hard decisions to stop the flow until something can be done that actually makes sense. The idea that Europe can sustain this is utter madness and we will ALL end up living in a world without the things that immigrants came to Europe for, they will be eroded away very quickly.
 
Hikari Kisugi said:
Uuuggh. 'there'
Of course you can quote out of context, when it demonstrates 'exactly' what the people driving the wars are doing. There is no point criticising one religion over another, they all have significant flaws. They all require 'faith', one either has it, or one doesn't. One can happily criticise those who would use a religion to drive their war, their holy war.
Islam is not a welcoming religion. It doesn't seek to 'get along' with anyone who isn't a follower.
Click to expand...


Yes. History should tell you that much: The Mughals in India, the Turks and the Byzantines, the Balkan war the list goes on.

People coming into a country aren't "just human beings" as those on the Left who advocate an open door policy they also bring a cultural identity and most importantly in this case, ideology. And its the latter thats the most pervasive and ultimately corrosive given enough time and numbers.

Islam simply doesn't believe in living in co-operation with non-believers, sooner or later they will attempt to either convert or take control. Its in their nature because its in their religion.

Hindu's come here, they don't seek to convert. Sikh's don't either. They have no problem with other religions. Islam is different. Have a read, if you ever wondered why Amjam Chowdery acts the way he does:

http://www.vexen.co.uk/religion/islam_unbelievers.html

Differnces lead to conflict. You see it the world over Irish Nationalists and Unionists, Hutu's and Tutsi's Catholics and Protestests, Sunni and Shia, even the Scots recently, until everyone is the same there will always be conflict. The Left and their fantasy of a multicultural utopia fail to learn the lesson of history at their peril.
 
itchy said:
I know what it was and it should be STD, as in sexually transmitted disease.
Not STI sexually transmitted infection. Although the same thing STD is the standard definition. Take it someone from the UK did not make that image.
Click to expand...

STI is now the preferred term not Std the NHS found the negative can notations of disease put people off getting tested etc while infection made people more willing to seek treatment as it was an infection that needed to be cured (most people see desiease as something permenant )
 
Jokester said:
Yep, nothing like 100,000s of fit young men willing to work in minimum wage jobs (and less than minimum wage in the black economy) whilst living 20 to a house. A capatilists wet dream.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's what I think this is all about again.

Money. It always is.

Hell donald trump wants to get rid of minimum wage in america.... that'll be great. Lets take the world back a couple hundred years and reintroduce slavery why don't we? cause you know? profit?
 
Ireheart said:
In the UK Saudi Arabia has already done this, they sponsor and fund dozens of mosques in the UK and 100s already across Europe, many of which have been linked to terror.

What Saudi Arabia practice is not moderate either, they are Wahhabi, a similar sect to Salfi, which is what ISIS are. In short, this kind of Islam is the worst and them building mosques should be condemned and not allowed,even at a diplomatic level but hey, OIL and money talks and they have plenty of it, people don't care about the human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia.

Read about their religion there, see links on the side for direct links to the islamic sects:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant
Click to expand...

Lol,we have another google sheikh on our hands.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom