Ivybridge to Skylake upgrade advice

Associate
Joined
28 Feb 2012
Posts
1,046
Location
Herts
Hi guys,

I'm thinking of upgrading my sig rig to Skylake as it looks like it will be another couple of years until Cannonlake arrives and some reviews are saying it will yield a 30% boost over Ivy.

I plan of buying only the 6700K CPU, a new mobo and some DDR4.

Hoping you guys can help with the below:

1. Will my cooler work with/fit the new CPU/socket?
2. Are there any mobos that have been particularly well rated and are worth considering?
3. A recommendation for 16GB DDR4.
4. Is there anything else I have overlooked?

Cheers :)
 
Cooler = yes, same holes, just need paste.

Boards = Ive used the Giga Z170XP-SLI and it works and overclocks and is not too ugly, There are CPU+Board bundles listed.

RAM = Kingston, Corsair, Avexir, 2666/3000Mhz is all good.
 
Honestly, imo...unless you have money to burn, it's not a worthwhile upgrade yet. Someone will have done it and will advise but I'd doubt you'd see much difference in anything you do.
 
I wouldn't upgrade yet wait one more generation or even 2 as this cpu is still great for gaming and rendering. I was going to say overclock your cpu but you already have 4.6ghz.

What res do you game at ? (1080p, 1440 or 4k?) What about another gtx 970 or maybe sell your 970 and buy something like gtx 980ti. Although wait to nivida to anwser as it seems not to support Async that dx12 uses.
 
Out of interest I know the i7-6700k is the top end skylake chip at the minute, but will more powerful ones come out later down the line?
 
It will just be slightly high clocked refreshes if they think they can get any more out of it, practically the same really.

You would have to be silly to go Skylake over x99 from ivybridge. I mean, if your gonna burn money for upgrade, you'd want one that gives you a performance boost you can feel rather than just a ambitiously overestimated figure on paper.
 
2. Are there any mobos that have been particularly well rated and are worth considering?

"It depends". Well what's actually important to you? All mobos are somewhat of a compromise.

If you want features / price. Then I would recommend you get the same mobo as me:

Gigabyte GA-Z170 Gaming 3
or
Gigabyte GA-Z170-UD3

Because it's got 2 'proper' m.2 slots and 3 'proper' PCI-3.0 4x or higher slots. And higher bandwidth USB 3.1 ports. Which is the best spec you'll find at that price.

However the BIOS kindda sucks a bit, in respect to the PWM CPU fan control. Wheras if you go for another manufacturer such as ASUS. Then you will get a better PWM fan control in your BIOS. But the flipside of that is fewer hardware features.

If you want to rely upon Intel IGP. Then there is the Gigabyte Z170-UD5 TH. Which has the proper implementation of USB Type C, including using it in Alt mode as Displayport, Thunderbolt 3 over USB Type C, 'proper' 4K support (at higher ramerates), HDMI 2.0 etc.

3. A recommendation for 16GB DDR4.

Corsair LPX 2400 (2x8GB) Black. Because they have 14-16-16-31 timings. Which is slightly better than the others at that same price bracket.

will more powerful ones come out later down the line?

As others have said, categorically 'no'. There is no reason to upgrade in terms of performance. What *might* come out later is some desktop part with better IGP graphics. But Intel haven't said anything whatsoever about that aspect yet. So nobody actually knows anything.

But when you look at the Skylake 6700K die photos, it's pretty obvious that a bigger IGP is the only thing they are likely to improve on it. 'cos one side of the chip is given over to i/o. Then other side is a huge block of IGP. There is no way they can put any extra DMI or lanes on the otherside without turning it into a Xeon chip, effectively. Yet Intel need to put in other business features for their enterprise chips. Hence different die from scratch required. Not fuses / feature disablement.

Perhaps if they were feeling really kind to us they might make a new die which ditched the IGP. Then there would be room in it's place for an extra 2 cores on the far side of all the bus / memory IO. But then the chip would still be limited by the IO (same fixed number of PCI-e lanes). So not much point to it really. Just get a Xeon instead.
 
Guys, thank you for all the replies, advice and suggestions - I really appreciate it.

I'll give it some thought. However, if the boost from Ivy is not going to be that big in practical terms - it sounds like it may be better to hold fire for Cannonlake. I have a rock solid 24/7 OC too.

I'll have a look at the 5820K though. I game at 1080p and also run flight sims, so the 6 cores on this CPU may be worth a look. Flight sims are still more CPU rather than GPU heavy (although that is slowly changing). Has this been a popular CPU?
 
Back
Top Bottom