Associate
- Joined
- 1 Jul 2015
- Posts
- 1,394
- Location
- Over There
A friend just sent me a link to this story, and told me that there was quite a heated discussion in her office regarding a few people who were adamant they would have been seeking answers and compensation from Air Canada for the delay in their flight due to the diversion being a technical issue with the aircraft.
Heartwarming story here ---> http://www.wthr.com/story/30040505/air-canada-pilot-diverts-flight-to-save-dog
Personally, I think a 75-minute delay for such an occurrence is much more than reasonable, and I don't think I could be callous enough to wish a chilly death upon the dog just so I got to my destination on time. Neither would I be wanting answers from the airline, these things happen and I'm glad the crew had the presence of mind to think of the dog that they were carrying.
Good publicity for Air Canada too, who I have always found to be a great airline to fly with.
What say you, other people?
Heartwarming story here ---> http://www.wthr.com/story/30040505/air-canada-pilot-diverts-flight-to-save-dog
Personally, I think a 75-minute delay for such an occurrence is much more than reasonable, and I don't think I could be callous enough to wish a chilly death upon the dog just so I got to my destination on time. Neither would I be wanting answers from the airline, these things happen and I'm glad the crew had the presence of mind to think of the dog that they were carrying.
Good publicity for Air Canada too, who I have always found to be a great airline to fly with.
What say you, other people?