Again more utter pish.
Scotland has about 10% of the population of the UK and has about 10% of the seats at westminster. How exactly are we over represented? If anything we have next to no influence in the way the UK is governed.
The Brit Nat crazies are out in force today!
So by your logic none of the non SNP MP's in Scotland would be Scottish MP's in Westminster?
As by your post you seem to be suggesting that only the SNP can represent Scottish voters, ever.
At the moment the SNP (a party that got about 1.5 million votes, out of 4 million in Scotland) has about 9% of the seats in the HOC despite getting less than 5% of the total votes.
So it's proprtion of the vote to seats is quite out of proportion.
To put that into perspective the Lib Dems got nearly 8% of the total vote (nearly a million more votes than the SNP) but only 8 MP's.
Some could suggest that under the current system the SNP has far far more influence for it's policies in Parliament than the number of it's votes should really give it (it didn't even get half the Scottish votes).
So before you spout off that Scottish voters voted against Westminster it's worth remembering that more people voted for Westminster/non SNP parties, and that the SNP for the number of people that supported it has a hugely out of proportion voice in Westminster.
I'd say well done for the SNP, and that the system worked as intended at the moment, but it does show up the weekness of first past the post quite well when a party with less than 5% of the national votes, and only 30ish percent of the regional votes gets around 9% and 95% of the positions respectively.