If you are explicitly stating, as fact, that "the genuine refugees are vastly outnumbered by the economic gimmiegrants" you better have something substantial.
If he doesn't have the proof, he shouldn't be making such ridiculous claims.
Most of them are from Syria, Eritrea and Afghanistan. All countries being torn apart by war.
Wrong again, most of the ones who've reached Western Europe are "young men", not most refugees in total. Why? Well if you're going to seek life in a far away country you can't easily get to don't you think it makes perfect sense for the men to go, claim asylum then bring their families over later safely?
The picture of the dead toddler on the beach didn't just change the debate here, it also taught refugees to leave their young and vulnerable in a safe place and let the young, fit member of the family make the rest of the trip.
Anyhoo, here are some actual numbers that prove the claim "most are economic migrants" wrong....
No they didn't, please read up on what the Geneva Convention actually says before spouting rubbish.....
I think the point is that if someone was leaving because they're in fear of their life/safety they would settle in the first safe country. Not travel half way around the world on a fairly dangerous journey.