The EU Migrant Crisis

Status
Not open for further replies.
Arazi said:
How is he being sexist? Are the children and the infirm only women in your opinion?
Click to expand...

So if I opened an a pub and said "No Women (Unless Disabled, Infirm or Under 16)" I wouldn't face any charges of sexual discrimination then?

What if I said "No Blacks (Unless Disabled, Infirm or Under 16)? Yeah I'm sure the judge would agree that I wasn't being racist because I let black children or the infirm in yeah. :rolleyes:
 
Whatever you want to think, IMO he wasn't being sexist. He was talking about the 10,000s of young healthy single men who totally outweigh the number of women, children and disabled etc etc, this isn't about opening a pub and debating who is allowed in!

Talk about taking it out of context.
 
Arazi said:
Whatever you want to think, IMO he wasn't being sexist. He was talking about the 10,000s of young healthy single men who totally outweigh the number of women, children and disabled etc etc, this isn't about opening a pub and debating who is allowed in!

Talk about taking it out of context.
Click to expand...

What about the young, single healthy women?
 
estebanrey said:
So if I opened an a pub and said "No Women (Unless Disabled, Infirm or Under 16)" I wouldn't face any charges of sexual discrimination then?

What if I said "No Blacks (Unless Disabled, Infirm or Under 16)? Yeah I'm sure the judge would agree that I wasn't being racist because I let black children or the infirm in yeah. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

<TRIGGERING INTENSIFIES>
 
Cosimo said:
Why so?
Click to expand...

She makes ill informed decisions and then complains when people call her out on it her Drugs policies for a start are ridiculous, several of the advisement boards ahve been brazenly ignored by her her stances on Khat and Marijuana are the complete opposite of the advise that shes been given bth by the scientific community and the police force. Her attitude towards the police has been shoddy at best and quite frankly she's waved off the immigration situation until now she's a laughable politician the only reason she's managed to keep her seat in Maidenhead is due to the fact that the competition here is even more laughable than her.
 
The Dread Pirate said:
She makes ill informed decisions and then complains when people call her out on it her Drugs policies for a start are ridiculous, several of the advisement boards ahve been brazenly ignored by her her stances on Khat and Marijuana are the complete opposite of the advise that shes been given bth by the scientific community and the police force. Her attitude towards the police has been shoddy at best and quite frankly she's waved off the immigration situation until now she's a laughable politician the only reason she's managed to keep her seat in Maidenhead is due to the fact that the competition here is even more laughable than her.
Click to expand...

Sounds to me like you've got the platform to stand against her.
 
Chuk_Chuk said:
What about the young, single healthy women?
Click to expand...

Which part of the 10000s of men don't you understand? Can you say there is anywhere near the same amount of young single women, stop clutching at straws and dragging your responses out of thin air.

Plus it would not surprise me if a large portion of the young single women you mention have got kids or other family in tow, where as the men do not, they left theirs back in war zones or camps, those brave brave men, but they did bring their iPhone's. :rolleyes:
 
Why are people surprised that only the fittest and most able are successful in evading ISIS, crossing a war zone and making it across Europe?
 
Tunney said:
Why are people surprised that only the fittest and most able are successful in evading ISIS, crossing a war zone and making it across Europe?
Click to expand...

Looking on a map at the area controlled by ISIS I don't think evading them would have been much of an issue for most.
 
Arazi said:
Whatever you want to think, IMO he wasn't being sexist. He was talking about the 10,000s of young healthy single men who totally outweigh the number of women, children and disabled etc etc, this isn't about opening a pub and debating who is allowed in!

Talk about taking it out of context.
Click to expand...

You said a policy that denied men of a certain refugee status wasn't sexist. It is. You may feel like you can justify the sexism but it's still sexism.

Are "young, healthy men" immune from bullets and bombs?

Furthermore, how cruel is it to accept an ill grandmother but then tell her "sorry your grandson and carer can't come as well because he is a man of fighting age so we're sending him back and telling him to join one of the rebel groups".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom