Soldato
- Joined
- 30 May 2007
- Posts
- 5,018
- Location
- Glasgow, Scotland
My mother is considering these, what are the opinions of you good chaps?
Petrol, not the diesel.
Thanks
Petrol, not the diesel.
Thanks
Not sure, but I know a lot of people have issues with some of the engines on the Polo. For starters some seem to go through a LOT of oil.
Better off with an A3 surely? A1 just seems like an expensive car for estate agents/pretenders.
This.
Assuming your budget gets the current A3, you'd be mad to take an A1 over the A3.
A massively expensive Fabia with a nicer interior. Is she really willing to spend that much more for a better instrument panel?
Yep absolutely bonkers money - 12k for a 4 year old car posted above.....mental
A fabia for less money is brand new
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201508075867298
The difference between the A1 and the polo/fabia is so much more than 'a better instrument panel'.
A little bit, but not enough to warrant the difference. I've driven a fair number of high spec A1s as courtesy cars, yet when it came to buying a car for my mother, we went Polo, as they represent better value for money, yet feel just as "quality" to the touch.
Granted the lack of MMI is about the only "downside", but my mother wouldn't have got to grips with MMI properly anyway.
What I didn't realise is that they do an S1 - with a 2.0L Turbo (At least I think it's a turbo) with 231BHP! They also do some special edition version in LHD only with 260ish BHP - in a car that size they must both really get a lick on, assuming it can get the power down. (Assuming it isn't Quattro!)
What I didn't realise is that they do an S1 - with a 2.0L Turbo (At least I think it's a turbo) with 231BHP! They also do some special edition version in LHD only with 260ish BHP - in a car that size they must both really get a lick on, assuming it can get the power down. (Assuming it isn't Quattro!)