• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Black Ops III: 12 GB RAM and GTX 980 Ti Not Enough

8Xuhe0g.gif
 
Well i've just played a bit, SP and Multiplayer. My RAM usage never went above 6gb, that's with a crap load running in the back ground. GPU Vram about 2.5gb. Mostly high settings, didn't look properly just wanted to have a go and a respectable 70-80fps 99% of the time, on a single card.
 
From the footage of the mp it looks like advanced warfighter after pumping crysis had a go at titanfall and incorporated its gimmicks into the game culminating in blops3. =/

New engine? Naaah, more idiotic bouncing is the way to go! :eek:
 
As a game, not the franchise we see now. Cod died a major death after the first modern warfare. As a game theyre so bad they make battlefield games look good. But in the case of those, theyre basically a long running beta that you pay top dollar for. The only game i know where they have to bring out a separate test build, (cte) alonside a game that was supposed to be finalised. Several patches, expansions later its still not great. And they say gameworks stuff is bad, probably not perfect in my limited use of gw titles. But, imho game developers are pushed too hard by publishers to fire out games to meet sale deadlines, then fall back on the patch approach. Everyones got a good net connection theese days, so patching has become the get out clause.
 
tommybhoy said:
Any hitching?
Click to expand...
Haven't had any of that, no.

You'll get stuttering if you use a texture setting higher than your card can handle, though. GTX970 wont handle the very highest texture setting('Extra'), but is just fine on High. 980Ti handles 'Extra'.

Also runs fine with just 8GB RAM. Game was using like 4.5GB of system RAM and that's it.

I'm not necessarily 'impressed' with how the game runs, but I'm running it fine. No performance issues or anything.
 
Nelly said:
I don't know what the fuss is about, only 0.08% of users even have a 2560x1600 resolution screen anyway, it's just a minority, so get your 1080p monitors out like the majority of users still have lol. :p

http://i.imgur.com/L9qMhWc.png[/IMG[/QUOTE]

Only 1.2% with 1440p? There was me thinking 1440p was pretty common these days. I love mine!
Click to expand...
 
So apparently this will be no better than the best games that have been on offer over the last few years, Yet my 8gb's of ddr3 and Fury pro will struggle with it if I want the eye candy on.
 
nashathedog said:
So apparently this will be no better than the best games that have been on offer over the last few years, Yet my 8gb's of ddr3 and Fury pro will struggle with it if I want the eye candy on.
Click to expand...
8GB of system RAM is fine man.

The Fury might need to knock the textures to High, though. I hear the top texture setting can use up to 4.5GB of vRAM(at 1080p).

But the game does give you a lot of options to crank settings up, so yea, dont be surprised if you cant absolutely max it out.
 
Seanspeed said:
8GB of system RAM is fine man.

The Fury might need to knock the textures to High, though. I hear the top texture setting can use up to 4.5GB of vRAM(at 1080p).

But the game does give you a lot of options to crank settings up, so yea, dont be surprised if you cant absolutely max it out.
Click to expand...

You have to consider that it uses 4.5GB when there's (presumably) 6GB/8GB available. It doesn't mean it NEEDS 4.5GB, My Fury X's run it fine. Well, I say fine - it runs just as well on Extra as it does High and Medium - it runs fairly badly whatever settings tbh, just doesn't feel smooth :/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom