So I read this this morning:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/09/gender-pay-gap-women-working-free-until-end-of-year
The gist of it is that there is a 'gender pay gap' of 14.2%, meaning that women earn that percentage less than men, and that to tackle it we need to set quotas for the number of women executives.
I am completely open to any evidence which proves a gender pay gap exists but it seems to me that a lot of this talk is based on working out the average pay of men and women respectively and simply registering the difference as proof of discrimination or patriarchy or whatever.
But doesn't that just ignore the fact that more women than men choose to put work second behind raising a family, and that men often do more dangerous jobs than women?
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/09/gender-pay-gap-women-working-free-until-end-of-year
The gist of it is that there is a 'gender pay gap' of 14.2%, meaning that women earn that percentage less than men, and that to tackle it we need to set quotas for the number of women executives.
I am completely open to any evidence which proves a gender pay gap exists but it seems to me that a lot of this talk is based on working out the average pay of men and women respectively and simply registering the difference as proof of discrimination or patriarchy or whatever.
But doesn't that just ignore the fact that more women than men choose to put work second behind raising a family, and that men often do more dangerous jobs than women?