Forum "Disputes"

The only option I think worth considering is a public one and a private one. Then people can choose to discuss things in private or not.
 
Edrof said:
You are welcome to highlight baduns by RTMing their posts. :)
Click to expand...

Not the point I'm making at all. at the stage where a person felt aggrieved enough to post in the disputes section we would be way passed the rtm process.

But if someone was silly enough to post a aggrievment and the moderation was fully within their rights to do what they did. All it would do is make the complaintent look bad.
 
Last edited:
Keep it private, that means forum users and mods have a little more freedom in what they can discuss.

Disclose any worthwhile, relevant conclusions to the wider forum. Not necessarily as a follow up to the original issue specifically, but as a lesson or just information on forum use generally.

Can't see much positive coming out of a public debate.
 
cheesyboy said:
Keep it private, that means forum users and mods have a little more freedom in what they can discuss.

Disclose any worthwhile, relevant conclusions to the wider forum. Not necessarily as a follow up to the original issue specifically, but as a lesson or just information on forum use generally.

Can't see much positive coming out of a public debate.
Click to expand...

That's how I feel about it to be honest.
 
It wouldn't be a public debate. Just a open gallery for the public to spectate. No third party would be able to post.

You would only post in the first place if you had a genuine reason to. And if the party feels strongly enough to do that then they would probably feel strongly enough to bring it to the communitys attention
 
Last edited:
Freefaller said:
The only option I think worth considering is a public one and a private one. Then people can choose to discuss things in private or not.
Click to expand...

UwwRhVg.gif.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom