ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.

Erm, we know he had weapons of mass destruction because (a) we gave them to him and (b) he used them to kill thousands of Kurds and Iranians.

I understand the point of the image, but the fact Iraq had WMD and the willingness to use them is undeniable.

Where's the reports of Coalition troops find all these WMDs then?
 
Nobody surely would say he never had them it was just that nobody could find them.

Had them and used them is correct.

Absolutely true. Going a little OT I know, but the truth is we didn't know if he still had them because he wouldn't let the inspectors do their job. What were we supposed to think? I never had any issue with going in to find out what he was up to, it was the BS surrounding it all that was stupid.
 
Could it be argued that US ineptitude led to 150,000 Iraqi deaths?

But then you could counter that the u.s were prompted to act based upon the way saddam had acted prior to the events and the perceived threat.

The only thing that is certain is that the people that killed them were their fellow countrymen and insurgents.

Not coalition forces.
 
Western foreign policy is essentially damned if they do or damned if they don't. if they try to help, they get criticised, if they don't they get criticised.

I was thinking more what can happen when a "simple" smash and grab goes wrong. It would be political suicide of that happened.
 
You don't get why they might not want ISIS fighters (regardless of nationality) to slip in and out of Europe unchecked?

Last I checked the schengen area didn't extent outside Europe. Maybe they expanded it without my noticing?;)

It wouldn't work very well anyway. I doubt many would be terrorists would be on direct planes from Paris to Syria.... A "holiday" flight out of the Schengen zone to one of the ex Schengen zones would do it...

Moses has a point about guns and explosives, but the they are land borders. Ues there is wholesale 10ft barbed wire fences installed along each border slipping guns and explosives over the border would be pretty easy.
 
For example the leader of the plot was previously in Syria, already had a terrorism conviction and was a wanted man... he managed to slip back into the EU. The fact he holds a Belgium passport isn't all that relevant. Stopping fighters from being able to sneak back in is rather useful.

Ok, that's a relevance point,and why I asked the question in the first place. :)

Border posts at every road crossing would make it a little harder to get across Europe, but people could quite easily sneak round them.
 
Great...hopefully if we can batter them enough from the air the moderates can do the rest. Ideal situation but we can but hope.

Never going to happen, that would only work if their own male population wasn't 90% manchildren, running to Europe at the first sign of trouble.
 
The only thing that is certain is that the people that killed them were their fellow countrymen and insurgents.

Not coalition forces.

Elsewhere in the news...

Arsonist denies Murder on the grounds that it was the burning building that killed his victims, not his Molotov!

:p
 
Alex Salmond has today said if France invokes article 5 other NATO countries should take no notice as it was never intended to be used for terrorism.

He also said France saying it is at war is an unfortunate use of words.

Its a little unfortunate that France have been bombing Isis for months, it already was a war, it hasn't just turned into one...
 
Erm, we know he had weapons of mass destruction because (a) we gave them to him and (b) he used them to kill thousands of Kurds and Iranians.

I understand the point of the image, but the fact Iraq had WMD and the willingness to use them is undeniable.

He didn't have any at the time of the attack though, which was the pretense of going to war in the first place. Aka the 45 minute claim.

The statement on the picture isn't well written though.
 
Reports coming in that IS have executed a Chinese hostage and Beijing have vowed to seek justice

Yup, they're simply attempting to get everyone to hate them in actions against them, and hoping that the forces between them accidentally inflict damage on each other. Additionally they want one state to publicly "own" the killing of members so they can publicise that the French, US or Russian politicians etc are impotent.. causing loss of face etc (in the case of asian cultures) because another state could do what they could not.
 
Back
Top Bottom