ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.

awaybreaktoday · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:08

dowie said:
that isn't what you said though - for context here is the original post - nothing about weapons inspections there:

now you're throwing in conditions about weapons inspections etc.. which would require western interference.... and of course what happens when he kicks out the weapons inspectors?

The west go to war, ISIS replaces him, then I as a Londoner has to worry about someone pulling out an AK47 while going to work while someone like you defends how ISIS came into being while living outside London.

dowie · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:11

awaybreaktoday said:
The west go to war, ISIS replaces him, then I as a Londoner has to worry about someone pulling out an AK47 while going to work while someone like you defends how ISIS came into being while living outside London.

do you think you perhaps worry too much? Of all the things that could kill you it is unlikely a terror attack is going to be it

awaybreaktoday · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:13

dowie said:
do you think you perhaps worry too much? Of all the things that could kill you it is unlikely a terror attack is going to be it

Say that to the families of those that were killed in the Paris attacks and lets see what kind of response you get from them.

dowie · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:15

why? are you messed up in the head or something - why would you want someone to antagonize the families of terror victims?

awaybreaktoday · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:17

dowie said:
why? are you messed up in the head or something - why would you want someone to antagonize the families of terror victims?

You already did with your comment.

Danthus · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:19

The army of 70,000 "troops" in Syria.

Seems 40,000 have been classed as "moderates" and 30,000 as "less moderate".

Sounds like a recipe for disaster if you ask me.

dowie · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:19

awaybreaktoday said:
You already did with your comment.

how?

awaybreaktoday · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:20

dowie said:
how?

This is a public forum after all.

dowie · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:22

you're not making any sense - do you not understand the difference between pointing something out objectively on a forum such as this and going up to an individual victim and saying something to their face purely in order to antagonize them?

awaybreaktoday · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:24

dowie said:
you're not making any sense - do you not understand the difference between pointing something out objectively on a forum such as this and going up to an individual victim and saying something to their face purely in order to antagonize them?

Social media, many things these days are picked up and tweeted in a flash these days, if you don't mean don't say it just for argument sake.

dowie · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:26

awaybreaktoday said:
Social media, many things these days are picked up and tweeted in a flash these days, if you don't mean don't say it just for argument sake.

eh? I do mean it - you're very unlikely to be killed in a terror attack. That is just an objective fact.

Why you'd want me to say that to someone who has lost someone in a terror attack is still rather strange?

awaybreaktoday · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:29

dowie said:
eh? I do mean it - you're very unlikely to be killed in a terror attack. That is just an objective fact.

Why you'd want me to say that to someone who has lost someone in a terror attack is still rather strange?

And I said that the the families of those killed in the Paris attacks would disagree with your statement. Two attacks in the same city in a period of 10 months and more expected in same city. That means its no longer strange for that city.

dowie · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:33

awaybreaktoday said:
And I said that the the families of those killed in the Paris attacks would disagree with your statement. Two attacks in the same city in a period of 10 months and more expected in same city. That means its no longer strange for that city.

no you didn't say that... you're doing that thing again where you claim to have said something you didn't - I can scroll up and see exactly what you said so it is a bit pointless

tis irrelevant whether some random people who are related to some victims of some other attack would agree or disagree with the statement that you're unlikely to be killed in a terror attack

you are unlikely to be killed in a terror attack!

awaybreaktoday · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:37

dowie said:
no you didn't say that... you're doing that thing again where you claim to have said something you didn't - I can scroll up and see exactly what you said so it is a bit pointless

tis irrelevant whether some random people who are related to some victims of some other attack would agree or disagree with the statement that you're unlikely to be killed in a terror attack

you are unlikely to be killed in a terror attack!

If you say so..... I am Jesus.

awaybreaktoday · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:38

I am truly Jesus the son of God. ISIS say they are Islamic, now going by some of the logic in this thread just because someone says they are something makes them that thing, so using that logic some of you use then that does make me Jesus the son of God.

dowie · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:39

perhaps you're just innumerate

SciNeT · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:43

jonneymendoza said:
I've read some of these comments today here and it's funny when I see people say that ISIS is not raging a religious war(they are) or the most laughable comment here saying they are not Muslim...

+1. It's the Islamist ideology that's responsible for the conflicts raging across the Middle East, whatever name you place upon it, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Al Shabab, the underlying platform is the same, Islam.

Watching the shills go at it hammer and tongs hopelessly trying to disassociate all things Islamic terrorism from Islam is most entertaining however.

Skunkworks · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:43

Please stop feeding it, Dowie.

awaybreaktoday · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:43

dowie said:
perhaps you're just innumerate

Perhaps your logic is flawed, example your immature statement above.

dowie · 1 Dec 2015 at 20:48

awaybreaktoday said:
Perhaps your logic is flawed, example your immature statement above.

was just an observation - if you're going to take issue with the fact that you're unlikely to be killed in a terror attack it would suggest that you lack basic numeracy