ISIL, ISIS, Daesh discussion thread.

As a great man once said:


To anyone who supported the bombing, your a disgrace to this nation, a disgrace to humanity and i hope you never have to witness what these people will be witnessing now.

Shame on you all.
 
As a great man once said:


To anyone who supported the bombing, your a disgrace to this nation, a disgrace to humanity and i hope you never have to witness what these people will be witnessing now.

Shame on you all.

The Iraq War was pointless and everything he said was true.

This is completely different.

We are already at war. They are slaughtering countless people every day in Syria.They want to kill us.
 
BECAUSE WE KILL THEM!! To a degree that is barely even comparable.

Are you that blind? :confused:

This speech is so relevant to this today, as it was then. You can't bomb an ideology.

What an utterly idiotic statement.
We've never been able to bomb an ideology however wars have pushed those ideology to such fringes there's little to worry about.
Nazism was an ideology, so ww2 was pointless was it?

Stupid statement is stupid. We aren't bombing an ideology, were bombing them, infrastructure and resources. Is is exciting, killing and rapping for more than any collateral damage we do.

nd no they don't want us dead because we bomb them, they wont us dead as we are infields and deserve to die regardless, same as the poor locals they are executing on genocide levels.
 
What an utterly idiotic statement.
We've never been able to bomb an ideology however wars have pushed those ideology to such fringes there's little to worry about.
Nazism was an ideology, so ww2 was pointless was it?

Nazism was an ideology spread by very few and believed by even less. Considering the amount of German troops who surrendered shows how little people believed in that ideology.

So it wasn't bombing the ideology, it was killing the heads.

Stupid statement is stupid. We aren't bombing an ideology, were bombing them, infrastructure and resources. Is is exciting, killing and rapping for more than any collateral damage we do.

Which results in another generation of children growing up watching British bombers fly over and kill their family, their friends and their neighbours.

nd no they don't want us dead because we bomb them, they wont us dead as we are infields and deserve to die regardless, same as the poor locals they are executing on genocide levels.

What a ridiculous comment. We've been bombing them for over 20 years and you seriously think this has NOTHING to do with it? And its all about us being infidels?

Go back to your space thread.
 
We are not bombing an ideology,every single war is over ideology's yet they've all worked.

No it has very little to do with us. Their ideology is quite clear.

And you think small numbers of collateral damage will make them hate us more than they hate IS, who are executing the locals on mass, raping on mass, forced extortion and everything in-between.

So yes idiotic post by you, which absolutely fails at any logic.
 
Last edited:
And you think small numbers of collateral damage will make them hate us more than they hate IS


"Back in March this year, the Washington DC-based Physicians for Social Responsibility (PRS) released a landmark study concluding that the death toll from 10 years of the "War on Terror" since the 9/11 attacks is at least 1.3 million, and could be as high as 2 million. But still, the reality is much worse as the report concludes.

The 97-page report by the Nobel Peace Prize-winning doctors' group is the first to tally up the total number of civilian casualties from US-UK led interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan."

"This means that in Iraq alone, the US-UK led war from 1991 to 2003 killed 1.9 million Iraqis; then from 2003 onwards around 1 million: totalling just under 3 million Iraqis dead over two decades."

Collateral right?

8VwIMXh.png


Hmmm.....
 
Last edited:
Total civilians killed, including those from the other side and ever side. Most of which wont be directly from uk-us but instead the instability that have let such groups as IS flourish and kill, most of them time dwarfing any of our numbers.

So no I dint think the locals who see there women be it friends, wives or mothers raped, and the women see lots of their men executed, supporting IS and joining them due to a few collateral deaths against the UK.
Will they like is, no. That however does not in anyway mean they join IS ir similar.
You appear to think that the area controlled by IS has large support for them, this isn't the case they rule by fear.

You have no argument as you clearly haven't thought about it.

And you can not even use that reason for thousands of fighters from other countries, who grew up over here and other countries and haven't seen or experienced any of them.

Such groups need sad desperate people, who want power, that is how they recruit. A life out of boring normality and into a position of power. Not collateral damage, for the most part as it dwarfs into comparison compared to what they do to these people.
 
Last edited:
Lol, good debate that.
Using fudged figures does not support you.
Assuming they all support Isis doesn't support your view, they don't.

Please, with your infinite wisdom, explain how my figures are "fudged" being they are from more reputable sources then the Sun paper you clearly read.
 
Please, with your infinite wisdom, explain how my figures are "fudged" being they are from more reputable sources then the Sun paper you clearly read.

I've already explained how they don't show what you say. They are total deaths, not deaths caused directly by USA/uk. Large percentage are from groups like IS.

Nice edit with chart, now go break down the chart for government especially take out Syrian government forces

Shall we take a more split down view from Iraq
17,049 civilians recorded killed of which
1748 killed by Iraq forces
4325 by isis
118 by US coalition
10858 Uknowen

Suddenly doesn't look so good for your figures does it.
 
Last edited:
People who can't understand the 'ISIS-Nazi / WW2-current saga' parallel need to have a re-think. It's pretty obvious.

Also why is it so hard to understand that we are bombing ISIS? We aren't bombing Syria, we aren't bombing civilians. We are bombing Islamic extremists with precision strikes. How is that a bad thing?

The next argument is 'it won't stop ISIS'. Oh ok, it won't stop it so we should just not bother then? let them run around the middle east committing genocide. Branching out into Europe every so often with a deadly attack.

Some people boggle the mind.
 
I've already explained how they don't show what you say. They are total deaths, not deaths caused directly by USA/uk. Large percentage are from groups like IS.

I'll quote again for you, since reading the Sun has clearly dulled your mind:

"Back in March this year, the Washington DC-based Physicians for Social Responsibility (PRS) released a landmark study concluding that the death toll from 10 years of the "War on Terror" since the 9/11 attacks is at least 1.3 million, and could be as high as 2 million. But still, the reality is much worse as the report concludes.

Nice edit with chart, now go break down the chart for government especially take out Syrian government forces

The total amount of recorded deaths in Syria for November this year:

Qr3vdmQ.png


Hmmm ISIL at 86, man these guys right?


Oh whats this:

Code:
Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2003	3	2	3977	3435	545	598	646	825	566	516	487	525	12,125
2004	610	663	1004	1303	655	909	834	878	1042	1033	1676	1129	11,736
2005	1222	1297	905	1145	1396	1347	1536	2352	1444	1311	1487	1141	16,583
2006	1546	1577	1957	1804	2277	2584	3298	2865	2565	2996	3084	2898	29,451
2007	3017	2679	2726	2565	2844	2199	2694	2481	1387	1324	1124	996	26,036
2008	858	1092	1667	1315	914	750	639	704	612	594	540	586	10,271
2009	372	407	438	589	428	563	431	653	343	441	226	478	5,369
2010	267	305	336	385	387	385	488	520	254	315	307	218	4,167
2011	389	254	311	289	381	386	308	401	397	366	279	392	4,153
2012	531	356	377	392	304	529	469	422	400	290	253	299	4,622
2013	357	360	403	545	888	659	1145	1013	1306	1180	870	1125	9,851
2014	1096	971	1028	1036	1098	4078	1569	1542	1465	1729	1425	1200	18,237
2015	1449	1597	808	1702	1213	1154	1580	1535	1181	1150	941	30	14,340

Monthly death toll for Iraq (JUST IRAQ), from UK-US led coalition.
 
2 million is not from direct deaths, what dont you understand about that.

4325 Isis compared to 118 by coalition, which do you think the locals hate more.
And Isis isn't just killing, its raping, extortion and everything else.

The numbers do not back you up.

And don't believe your little chart, you can count more than 86 on ********s alone.

Oh and one mass grave in Syria last month found over 230 bodies killed by isis, nice fudged numbers you have again.
 
Last edited:
Latex... your figures are total deaths?

It's not showing who killed who? So ISIS could be responsible for all those deaths bar the ISIS figure. Then again, I wouldn't put it past them killing their own :rolleyes:
 
2 million is not from direct deaths, what dont you understand about that.

4325 Isis compared to 118 by coalition, which di you think the locals hate more.
And Isis isn't just killing, its rapping, extortion and everything else.

The numbers do not back you up.

The numbers back me up perfectly fine. You said:

And you think small numbers of collateral damage will make them hate us more than they hate IS, who are executing the locals on mass, raping on mass, forced extortion and everything in-between.

And I've just shown you that on a monthly basis over the 10 years in Iraq, we killed more civilians then ISIS. I don't call that small collateral damage.

The Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL) has executed more than 10,000 people, including women and children, in Iraq and Syria since the jihadist group declared a “global caliphate” in June 2014, reports Daily Mail Online.


Wow. so Syria and Iraq combined, ISIS kill roughly 277 in Iraq a month.
 
The numbers don't back you up, we aren't even going in on foot. Like Iraq.
277 a month, no they are killing far more than that, ah daily mail the best place fir figures.
Lets just ignore the videos Isis themself upload, the mass graves that have been found and survivors.
 
People who can't understand the 'ISIS-Nazi / WW2-current saga' parallel need to have a re-think. It's pretty obvious.

Also why is it so hard to understand that we are bombing ISIS? We aren't bombing Syria, we aren't bombing civilians. We are bombing Islamic extremists with precision strikes. How is that a bad thing?

The next argument is 'it won't stop ISIS'. Oh ok, it won't stop it so we should just not bother then? let them run around the middle east committing genocide. Branching out into Europe every so often with a deadly attack.

Some people boggle the mind.


but we are bombing Syria, Isis isn't a place. We will bomb civilians and there will be collateral damage, the intel will be rubbish and our forces will **** up and blow up some civies
 
Back
Top Bottom