This is said without sarcasm: But its amazing what propaganda can do no?
Make your point clearly.
This is said without sarcasm: But its amazing what propaganda can do no?
Make your point clearly.

Heh, reminds me of those people who only post "this thread is full of idiots" and then leave![]()

Make your point clearly.
I would say that the biggest threat to Islamic/Islamist ideology is education their second class citizens who are decreed as property
Waiting to make a point?
I would welcome you making any point at all![]()

I'm not sure it is - there are far fewer poor people in the world than people tend to imagine, plenty of people in Islamic countries have quite reasonable standards of living - Islamism is still a problem among people from moderate families not living in poverty both in Islamic countries and in the west
poverty and lack of education are often touted as a reason, especially by people who want to say completely disassociate their religion, community - tis much easier just claim that terrorists were massively ignorant and simply don't understand their religion or to pretend they're simply isolated backwards people who don't understand than to face up to reality
The MSM are all pushing an agenda however brazen, however insidious. They are and have failed at truthful reporting as have virtually all press.
I would say that the biggest threat to Islamic/Islamist ideology is education their second class citizens who are decreed as property
do believe everything you see in the news and on the internet or something?The Assad regime are actually worse than the Islamic State - they just don't film their sadistic torture-executions and upload them to ********, but those affected know what's going on. That's why most Syrians want to get rid of Assad before they tackle IS. I'm not convinced that Assad is no threat to the West either - all these Arab strong-men leaders seem to embrace the jihadi cause when it suits them e.g. lots of jihadis were allowed to travel through Syria to Iraq to fight coalition soldiers there - I bet Assad could have stopped that if he'd have wanted to.
Surely they've been there more than 17 seconds? /sarcasm
I did find a Reuters report confirming this, but they did not carry much of the official Iraqi response to it, and mostly glossed over it whilst going to great lengths to explain Turkey's reasons for doing this.
Very provocative act from Turkey, coming hot on the heels of the shoot down of the Russian SU-24. Are they acting purely in their own interests, or does this perhaps now show a pattern of them playing a role set out for them by NATO, to provoke Russia/Assad/Iraq into some kind of retaliation that would be interpreted as an "attack on NATO"? Judging by the justifications for this act set out by Reuters (which most other western media will follow), it's the latter. If it isn't, then Turkey is due very heavy criticism and some form of punishment by fellow NATO countries.
there is no proof other than someone lost their job but oh kim jong-un must have executed them with nukes or something
Several points were made, but I'm sure you missed them through this pig headed attitude demonstrated again in the last comment. You seem reluctant to think out with what you read in the newspapers or see/hear on the news which is fair enough, just don't attempt to belittle or disregard those who disagree with you. It puts you in a position where you seem less intelligent.
Going back to the original point, the RAF and the BBC are a biased source of information. Take from that want you want. I'm done with this silly, increasingly defensive right wing thread.
Edit:![]()

Radicals always have the limelight in pushing their agenda......
^No?
Oh I can see the wording may be confusing... I was just pointing out that the right are not as blind to obvious bias as has been suggested, yet the Left seem unaware of the extremes their media promotes.
Last week some leftie group banned a women's Yoga class because it was "appropriating another culture" and this was deemed insensitive. It had to be renamed "mindful stretching" instead.
No one appears to question this idiocy?
The abuse of human rights in North Korea is well documented. The 2014 United Nations report is a good starting point.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/17_02_14_nkorea_unreport.pdf
Are you really suggesting this is all some kind of ruse?
Digital Media boredom I suspect.
do believe everything you see in the news and on the internet or something?
Like those north korea stories of people being executed all the time.. there is no proof other than someone lost their job but oh kim jong-un must have executed them with nukes or something, it makes a good story and the western world are gullible enough to believe anything
so that report includes the assinations of key members by AA guns and stuff?
pretty sure not.
