Why Are Westerners Having Less Kids ?

As Dicehunter said earlier, perhaps westerners are worried about bringing kids up in a country becoming overwhelmed by madly breeding none westerners? ;)
 
Something that I've noticed more and more in the last few years among all of my friends is a growing trend.

Now, Around 50% of my friends are Indian that I grew up with and the other 50% are western i.e English, Irish, Scottish, German, French and a few Americans and the thing I've noticed is that all my Indian friends aspire to have a family with at least 3-4 kids which is great and bearing in mind most of my Indian friends aren't rich, They are just working 9-5 jobs like everyone else.

The other 50% of my friends who are westerners maybe 1 in 5 has 1 kid with the rest deciding to get a dog, Cat or maybe both.

Now what a couple decides to do is their own business but I've asked other people and they've all told me the same thing that I've observed happening.

I'm curious as to why westerners are deciding to purposefully diminish their own population, Even the UN has said that the USA, UK, Germany, France etc... has a birth rate so low it might as well be going backwards.

Again this is just my own observation and what I've learned so far, Thoughts ?

EDIT

A few sources for declining western birthrates -

A UN article points towards replacing Europe's ever decreasing population with immigrants as a solution

http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/migration/migration.htm

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...g-despite-an-increasing-world-population.html

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/23/baby-crisis-europe-brink-depopulation-disaster

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-32929962

http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkot...d-europes-decline-its-the-birth-rates-stupid/

http://www.forbes.com/sites/current...or-developed-countries-declining-birth-rates/

True Western countries have gone over to consumerist spending splurges for the latest 'must have' trinket, holiday etc. and not bothered about family. Family limits the time you have to do the things you may want. People organise round themselves, a parent has to organise round the family when they want to do something for themselves(if it can even be arranged). Family is expensive and a long term commitment as well as bringing new problems.
Asian families are still family orientated at present but I think by the time they get to the second or third generation in a Western country they will be no different. There is also the massive expense of housing for a family base.
 
It is also far less acceptable to sleep around before marriage as a women in these countries (regardless of the religion of the country). People still do though as it is human nature but that contraception is less readily available because of it. It is completely normal for eastern couples to be married by their early 20's too.
 
It's a **** overcrowded world. Constant wars, terrorism, horrible diseases. Resources are being depleted. You have to fight tooth and nail to get jobs and even then they are not secure. I find kids to be highly irritating, but that might be due so much bad parenting.

Being selfish for not having children is the dumbest thing I've heard. Every child born is just an extra Strain on the planet. This is far more selfish. What if your child has a serious problem and suffers in life. How do you deal with that?
 
It's a **** overcrowded world. Constant wars, terrorism, horrible diseases. Resources are being depleted. You have to fight tooth and nail to get jobs and even then they are not secure. I find kids to be highly irritating, but that might be due so much bad parenting.

Being selfish for not having children is the dumbest thing I've heard. Every child born is just an extra Strain on the planet. This is far more selfish. What if your child has a serious problem and suffers in life. How do you deal with that?

Until someone raises a child that works out how to cure a disease, feed a nation, reduce pollution, discover the secret to planetary terraforming and colonisation, etc.
 
It's definitely the cost of living. Yes ok, enough with the house price argument -- that's old now. But what goes with that is the horrendous state of the private rented sector -- I've always argued that this is damaging our communities.

You have a generation of 25-40yr olds that have no stake in society apart from their own well-being. They have no stake in their community because they rent and could be kicked out at any moment. If they're not kicked out then their scum-sucking landlord could raise the rent to an unaffordable amount and force them out. I lived 5yrs in my 'community' only to be kicked out when my landlords wanted to refurbish. Rents had gone up so much that we couldn't afford to stay. So we moved to the other side of London. That sort of things isn't quite on the same 'sob story' scale as homeless people, but it's probably all-too common.

On top of this, why on earth would you want to bring up a child in that situation. They'd have to move schools every few years, tear them away from friends etc. it would be horrendous. And really bad for a child's upbringing. That's without taking into account the sheer expense (expensive rents, moving costs). We have a situation where two 30+yr old working adults can only afford a two bedroom flat in the south east/London. No wonder they aren't having kids.
 
Until someone raises a child that works out how to cure a disease, feed a nation, reduce pollution, discover the secret to planetary terraforming and colonisation, etc.

A good point, it would be better encourage development of technology and 'green attitudes' rather than to frown upon people having unprotected sex (regardless of motive).

Also far more effective
 
Fewer.

And I think it's because of society/attitudes in general really. And look at the world we live in; a society that thinks its cool to be a celebrity that doesn't actually do anything of worth. A society that thinks its cool to be vacuous and live your life on social media. A society that strives to be nugatory. Why would you want to bring children into that?
 
Last edited:
I also hate being ill. From what I've seen, once you have kids, you spend the next 11 years at least being continually sick. Coughs, colds, chicken pox, bum runs, you name it ;)

Schools are breeding grounds for every contagious illness known to man :p
 
My views

If you don't have the drive to have kids they make no sense

Expensive
Can be ungrateful
Can't change your mind once you have them
Tie you down to a place (changing school is turbulent)
You have to give up much of your life
Risk of relationship breakdown, kids make this tougher

So it really makes no sense if you don't feel that biological need

A dog
You can move easily
Cheaper
If need to you can rehome
Love you no matter what
Won't cause you hassle
(much cuter on a personal note)

Seems logical to me.
 
It's definitely the cost of living. Yes ok, enough with the house price argument -- that's old now. But what goes with that is the horrendous state of the private rented sector -- I've always argued that this is damaging our communities.

Old?... Just like PFI?
 
Old?... Just like PFI?
Que? I meant it's 'old' as in (a) I bang on about it enough and (b) it's now widely accepted. What gets forgotten when talking about the 'housing market' a whole is the horrible private rented sector. Hence, my comments.
 
I'm not having kids as the world is already overpopulated and I just don't really like kids. Anyone having more than 2 children needs to have a word with themselves though.
 
I imagine allot of us dont want to fall into the expected social normality of partner - marriage - house - kids.

Plus bringing a child into this world can be considered an act of cruelty to quote the great Nicholas cage :D
 
A prime example is my parents. Mother never worked. Dad brought home the bacon. Mortgage paid off in ten years. You could feel a lot less pressure in the home.

Bring it forward to my generation. We have one daughter. Both in work. We actually work opposite shifts so see each other around 20 hours a week when not on holiday. We bought a nice house at 23 but will not have it paid off till our early forties. Both our parents have emigrated. We are trying for another baby but by God we know how hard it is!

Cost of living has made it very difficult to have a family that will stay together. We can not all be like prince William and retire at thirty!

These people who have a lot of kids do so on government welfare and is not something I would want to do.
 
Oh yeah, I totally forgot to mention the rather glaring fact that most households need both partners to work to actually, you know, survive. Why you would add a kid into that mix I do not know...
 
Both parents very busy working \ child care costs \ ambitions and aims that children may prevent \ An easier life \ certain atheist viewpoints.

These are the reasons we currently have no children

atheist viewpoints? would be interested in hearing more about that.
 
Back
Top Bottom