Is Time magazine an onion publication?

Soldato
Joined
16 Jun 2013
Posts
5,375
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35048796

While I can't stand Merkel personally it's not hugely surprising to see her at the top but the next two places are interesting;

2nd place - Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
3rd place - Donald Trump.

Is there a lack of people this year or are they being deliberately controversial to sell more copies?

Who would be your person of the year?
 
It's not an honour list, but one of the most influential people in the world in the year, for example they have had Stalin and Hitler on the list before

So you can't really deny the leader of ISIS is up there and Trump even though what he is saying is ridiculous, is certainly causing seismic tremors in US politics
 
Wikipedia said:
Person of the Year (called Man of the Year until 1999[1]) is an annual issue of the United States news magazine Time that features and profiles a person, group, idea or object that "for better or for worse...has done the most to influence the events of the year"

Runners up definitely fall within that. Hitler was named Person of the Year once as well, as was Stalin
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35048796

While I can't stand Merkel personally it's not hugely surprising to see her at the top but the next two places are interesting;

2nd place - Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
3rd place - Donald Trump.

Is there a lack of people this year or are they being deliberately controversial to sell more copies?

Who would be your person of the year?

Hitler won it before. It's not 'best person of the year'
 
Ooo I thought it was a honours list :(.

Feel free to close I have no point :D.

To be fair to you, it's generally interpreted that way and on the whole pans out that way :)

But as that wiki quote says, it is just for influential people for better or worse.
 
This is bloody awful,
Merkel works out that German needs to increase its birth rate, the simplest way of doing that in her eyes is by emptying Africa and the ME of young people. So she invites everyone to Germany for free money and twiglets.

Marxists suddenly start wetting their knickers at the thought of another minority that might vote for them, and declare her full of compassion for ickle babies and the poor sad face people of the world. Time then hands her a gong.

Utter BS, she had a political problem to solve and she solved it, and sod what the German people wanted.
Politicians conveniently forget, nobody ever votes for a multicultural society, it just gets inflicted on them to solve the politicians labour or birth rate crisis.

Whenever Cameron needs new Doctors and Nurses, he just depletes countries like the Philippines or India. That is no different to what Merkel has just done, minus the ickle babies...

In fact Cameron has done the most to preserve the future of Syria, by helping provide camps near the source of the issue.

<insert flip table gif>
 
This is bloody awful,
Merkel works out that German needs to increase its birth rate, the simplest way of doing that in her eyes is by emptying Africa and the ME of young people. So she invites everyone to Germany for free money and twiglets.

Marxists suddenly start wetting their knickers at the thought of another minority that might vote for them, and declare her full of compassion for ickle babies and the poor sad face people of the world. Time then hands her a gong.

Utter BS, she had a political problem to solve and she solved it, and sod what the German people wanted.
Politicians conveniently forget, nobody ever votes for a multicultural society, it just gets inflicted on them to solve the politicians labour or birth rate crisis.

Whenever Cameron needs new Doctors and Nurses, he just depletes countries like the Philippines or India. That is no different to what Merkel has just done, minus the ickle babies...

In fact Cameron has done the most to preserve the future of Syria, by helping provide camps near the source of the issue.

<insert flip table gif>

I see your point, but my question is why haven't the german people spoken up about this?

I mean a lot of people in the UK (and I'm talking about a good percentage of the population, not just opinions from here) have raised their concerns about how her policies have affected the EU as a whole, well all this is happening initially in german cities etc isn't it?

Surely if it was such a massive issue the german populace would be having a vote of no confidence in her or something? I don't mean small scale demonstrations either as they're ten a penny even in this country, I mean a concerted effort to regain control of the borders/EU/policy.

I'm staying impartial on the politics of it all, I just wonder why people are of the opinion that she is 'sod what the german people think' when in reality they could be acting against it but theyre not (as far as I can see, welcome for proof).

I'm not saying her position in the article is right either, she is a fairly minor drop in the world as we know it this year.
 
I see your point, but my question is why haven't the german people spoken up about this?

Merkel up to this point has been immensely popular in Germany, the Euro has been great for their economy and it is in the German nature to like order and efficiency.
Accepting refugees is just going to slot right into that way of thinking as the right thing to do, so they've gone along with it without really questioning it.
But Germany isn't one big blob of people, rural areas are quite a bit more conservative, and while they still see this as the right thing to do, they don't understand why anyone would not wish to integrate with the German way of life, the idea of being "separate" is alien to them.

And this is where Merkel is lying to them, nobody in Europe needs to accept anyone. We are quite capable of providing for them on the borders of Syria.
But doing that doesn't solve Merkels population crisis, so she's led Europe into believing that migration is the only way, but in doing so she will need to fool the rest of Europe into taking a few million as well. If it was just Germany doing this then it would look a bit suspicious.

Now Germany is torn, far right groups are voicing what people only say in private, Merkel can't back down because millions will be arriving next Summer too, but again the idea of not following a plan is anathema to them, so on they trudge in the hope that all this will just work itself out.

This has been allowed to drift because any dissent can be crushed just by invoking the ghost of Nazism, they remain so ashamed of this that they daren't do anything that would allow another European country to point the finger again.

She's being awfully naive here, she's looked at previous migrations of Jamaicans and Ugandan Asians and assumed because all that went well, then 10 million Muslims is going to work too.
But if you can flood an area with one culture then that town belongs to you, why bother trying to be German when you've essentially re-created your home country inside another state.

Everyone does this, China town, the Jewish quarter in New York, Paris, the little white enclaves in Spain. This works in Britain because nobody has had a reason to notice migrants before. But now we do have a reason because the entire world is looking at this one group every single day, and I don't think Germany will adapt easily to having two separate communities in their country.
 
Last edited:
all fair points, indeed time will tell how it works out.

I know for a fact despite what some might think my opinion is an open border policy is wrong, but I'd have thought maybe more germans would have spoken out against it.

After all, Nazism was 70 years ago now and its not the same principles. Turning people away because you cannot afford culturally and economically allow millions in is not the same as mass genocide or forced invasion.
 
Hitler was on times person of the year edition, Apparently to be their person of the year you just have to open your countries doors to half of the middle east and africa :p

all fair points, indeed time will tell how it works out.

I know for a fact despite what some might think my opinion is an open border policy is wrong, but I'd have thought maybe more germans would have spoken out against it.

After all, Nazism was 70 years ago now and its not the same principles. Turning people away because you cannot afford culturally and economically allow millions in is not the same as mass genocide or forced invasion.

As I'm from Germany I know a huge amount of people have spoken out about letting in so many people but they were simply ignored by the media and the politicians in favour of listening to our completely self destructive liberals who are running face first into a concrete wall, Some of our liberals would make other liberals seem sane and the rational logical people who have stated logical reasons why this is a really bad idea simply get called nazis and bigots even when we have had rapes occour done by the current immigrants to school girls but does it get media attention ? Nope we find out through schools issuing warnings to parents to not allow your daughters to travel anywhere alone.

The whole situation is messed up, Merkel is lucky she hasn't been dragged out under a tree and a cotton fiber necklace given to her.
 
Last edited:
Lost every shred of respect or interest in that rag when they chose zuckerberg over Julian assange for purely political reasons.

This is just another example. Why not have a picture of the local binmen who in my opinion serve far more use to society than these junked up selfish and evil politico-elite
 
Back
Top Bottom