Kotaku again: Watch_Dogs 2 due this year

antijoke

antijoke

antijoke

Caporegime
Joined
28 Jan 2003
Posts
40,002
Location
England
In amongst the AssCreed stuff is the nugget that WD2 could be the filler for the gap for 3916, they suggest it is also set in San Francisco.

For all the floors and uproar over Watch_Dogs I did enjoy the game and hopefully they polish up the systems that were there to give us a great game.

Just no spreadsheets for preorder content please.
 
Looking forward to it i really enjoyed the first watch dogs, I would like to see them improve the online a bit.
 
Watch Dogs was a decent enough first go, spoiled by the atrocious storyline, shallow characters and general lack of depth to the main hacking mechanic. Not to mention the disappointment that the game neither looked nor worked quite how it did in the pre-release previews, but then that's a Ubisoft trademark these days.

I did really like some of the online modes though, before everyone started to get wise to how to spot they were being hacked/tailed at least. Wasn't broken on release either, which shouldn't even be something that warrants mentioning, but alas.
 
TheVoice said:
I did really like some of the online modes though, before everyone started to get wise to how to spot they were being hacked/tailed at least. Wasn't broken on release either, which shouldn't even be something that warrants mentioning, but alas.
Click to expand...

Eh?! Did I try and give up on the same Watch_Dogs?
 
Love the game ... in fact I need to go back to complete some side missions . The online , while I enjoyed it to start , got annoying as hell from the hackers and stupid ways people used to avoid being hacked ( boat on water anyone ) .
 
I was seriously let down by Watch Dogs. They hyped it up too much & had me expecting a lot. In the end it turned out to be a mediocre game with 0 replay value, for me at least.
 
I enjoyed Watch_Dogs. I never follow the hype of games as most of the time it sets expectations too high.

I will probably get WD2, just not at launch.
 
Await the Ubisoft bullshots/bullvids of what WD2 could look like........but wont at release.

Having said that, they seemed to have mostly kept their word with The Divisin since the alpha but I guess the final release will reveal all.
 
I found the first one had great acting/graphics/sound and potentially story, just found the game far too difficult. Still stuck on an early mission on a roof trying to use cameras and tech to get data from one of the guards, just can't do it.

I hope they polish up the actual gameplay to make it more accessible as I'll defo buy it.
 
I loved the WD online mode where you could stalk/hack another opponent in their SP game, was fun watching them try to find you :D
 
ic1male said:
Dayum. I misread the title as Sleeping Dogs 2. Now I'm disappointed. :p
Click to expand...

That would be awesome, love Sleeping Dogs!

davewhite04 said:
I found the first one had great acting/graphics/sound and potentially story, just found the game far too difficult. Still stuck on an early mission on a roof trying to use cameras and tech to get data from one of the guards, just can't do it.

I hope they polish up the actual gameplay to make it more accessible as I'll defo buy it.
Click to expand...

I found it pretty easy, guess it's down to the person. I was pretty hyped up for it, wasn't as good as it was shown or could have been but overall really enjoyed it. So if they stick to what they show for WD2 then it could be really good.
 
davewhite04 said:
I found the first one had great acting/graphics/sound and potentially story
Click to expand...

The story was awful and made little real sense most of the time e.g the guy cared more about his niece being killed than her own mother did, her kidnapping being of no concern to anyone else etc. It was like something lifted from a made-for-TV movie.

Not to mention DeadSec only ever being mentioned a few times but never properly utilised for the entire game. Presumably they'll be the focus in WD2 but it was still a complete waste.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom