Man of Honour
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2003
- Posts
- 91,832
- Location
- Falling...
I personally have no issues with it and find it reassuring.
I'm afraid I don't believe that for a second.
What you do in your private life is irrelevant unless it can be demonstrated to be relevant do your work. That has to be based on reasoning and not arbitrary rules.
It's a pre-employment test of which the OP will need to agree to declaring the results to the company, this includes specific results so depending on the company's specific alcohol and drug policy would give them a justification not to employ them.It's legal to sack someone for having a blood alcohol level which isn't based on legality or at least an argument of what is reasonable? Without that level being even communicated to the employee?
You are utterly wrong. And it is relevant for work.
There are hundreds of cases of people being sacked and guess what they all stand.
I'm afraid I don't believe that for a second.
What you do in your private life is irrelevant unless it can be demonstrated to be relevant your work. That has to be based on reasoning and not arbitrary rules.
You think it is legal to fire someone for having any level of alcohol and calling it alcohol misuse?
I don't believe that for a second, is legal.
You think it is legal to fire someone for having any level of alcohol and calling it alcohol misuse?
I don't believe that for a second, is legal. I'm sure most companies take a pragmatic approach.
It's not called alcohol misuses, it's called failing a test that is in your contract, and is very legal. Go find me a court case where they have thrown it out.
Why are you even saying such nonsense. this isn't a new phenomena, it's been around for decades. And you wont find such cases as it's very much legal.
Talk to a pilot
I just don't think in those cases it is as black and white as you've put it.
I'm not going to go out and do the research so I'll just concede the point.
You think it is legal to fire someone for having any level of alcohol and calling it alcohol misuse?
I don't believe that for a second, is legal. I'm sure most companies take a pragmatic approach.
ours is a zero tolerance policy i personally don't agree with it for the simple fact im quite literally not allowed out on a night for a drink with friends, if i get caught i get caught im not staying in all my life.
I just don't think in those cases it is as black and white as you've put it.
I'm not going to go out and do the research so I'll just concede the point.
How does that contradict my point? Pilots also have a legally defined limit. Do airlines take a zero tolerance approach, as in zero blood alcohol level? I doubt it.
It relay is.
It is common, many people get sacked for this and none of them win.
Not grammatically incorrect thoughRelay? Don't start sentences with And either, It's relay annoying.