Save the NHS!

Associate
Joined
5 Nov 2013
Posts
1,093
Location
Ross-on-Wye
Ive been trying to stay out of discussions like this but I dont feel like I can at the moment. I am actually an FY1 (most junior of all doctors) at a hospital in the west midlands and I do take exception to a few of the points raised above.

1) Monetary concerns. This so called '13.5% pay rise' is nothing of the sort. At the moment, the starting salary for an FY1 is £22,636 + a banding supplement based on the number of anti-social hours we work. This can vary between 10-80% depending quantity and type of hours worked. The new contract increases basic salary by 13.5% while almost completely eliminating banding by doing away with half the anti-social hours we work - saturday being the main culprit.

Medicine is one of the only jobs I know where you are not actually payed for the hours you work. I am contracted on a normal day to be in the hospital on the wards from 0800-1700. During that time I am not scheduled any breaks but told by staffing to 'take half an hour when I can'. If at any point during this break I am bleeped, I have to answer it. If a patient is sick at 1655 I have to help sort the patient out. If I am scrubbed in in theatre I have to stay there until the operation is done for no compensation money wise or time wise. There is no overtime which we get paid for, we entirely rely on banding to make the job viable for supporting a family.

At no point were we asking for more pay (despite a pay freeze, such that, after inflation and removal of free accommodation, the starting salary for FY1s should be around £35k) we were just asking for the current system of banding to remain unchanged.

Times are hard in austerity and, yes, doctors are well paid relative to the general population. But relative to another graduate who has done 3 years degree and then worked for 3 years we are around £15k a year behind where they are at the same point in our lives.

2) time. Yes, Mr Hunt has graciously said that he is capping the working week at 72hrs. Currently the EWTD has capped this at 48hrs which no-one brings up any way despite the fact that we are technically meant to abide by this. However the rebranding of saturday as plain time means that I am going to be made to work more saturdays and be given off time during the week as 'compensation'. Helpful when none of my friends or family have time off during the week, meaning that I am unable to actually socialise with anyone outside of my firm.

3. Consultant contracts and other allied professionals. This is the major concern, not just for Juniors, but everyone else in the NHS. It was juniors today, tomorrow it will be consultants and the day after it will be everyone else. Nurses currently get paid 130% for working on a saturday - soon it will be plain time just like the rest. Who in their right mind would agree to work on a saturday for no extra money?

4. Medical recruitment. This year, application to specialties was at an all time low. They couldnt even fill all the surgical posts. Dropping this on an already demoralised workforce will shatter recruitment to specialty posts. Mr Hunt himself admitted that the problem at weekends isnt the lack of juniors but that of senior decision makers. All well and good spouting '7-day NHS' every other sentence, but when there will be no consultants in 10 years time that is a policy sure to fail

5. Mortality at weekends. This is probably the biggest problem with everything. The studies which the health secretary keeps trotting out do NOT say this at all. It is the 30-day mortality for patients admitted at weekends. Actual mortality at weekends is LOWER. This is not due to problems at the weekends; it is because patients who present to hospital at the weekend tend to be sicker. Put simply, people do not want to go to the hospital a weekends unless they are severely unwell.

6. Out of program study. Currently, if you take time out of the NHS to do an academic fellowship or a PhD (necessary for both innovation in the NHS as well as being able to actually get a consultants post) you slot back in to your program at the same place but with a slightly higher pay level, firstly to appreciate what you have done and also to encourage people to follow other forms of study. The new contract wants to remove this entirely. This is important to ensure that people who take time out in order to study, say, a cure for cancer or have a baby will be unfairly penalised against.

7. the lies the health secretary tells. Not only does he keep saying that 'mortality is higher on weekends' (despite being called out on in in parliament today) which is simply not true, but he keeps saying that the BMA has failed to negotiate. This again is simply not true; the BMA originally agreed to talks, then again at acas, not the government. He says that pay is increasing, despite the fact that calculations show hes wrong. He says that hours worked will be less, despite this being simply wrong as well as rebranding saturday as normal hours.


These are just some of the reasons why doctors and other workers are so irate. If you want to see more, visit the BMA's website where there is much more information.

Agree with me, or dont. But you will definitely see doctors emigrating for a better life or resigning and working in anything other than Mr Hunt's NHS.
 
Last edited:
Permabanned
Joined
5 Jun 2010
Posts
15,459
If patients outcomes are the priority for Hunt, then why does this contract only apply to doctors in England?

Does he not care about services in Scotland or Wales?
 
Associate
Joined
5 Nov 2013
Posts
1,093
Location
Ross-on-Wye
Lots of salary paid people do overtime for no extra pay, and equally lots of people support a family on less than £22k...

Not when youve done 6 years of medical school, racking up over £100k in just student loan which you have to start paying back as soon as you start earning over £18k a year.

You also have to pay for exams to sit. In order for me to even be anywhere near like short-listed for surgical training I have to at least sit my MRCS part A before november which is £516 out of my taxed income. Let alone the books and the time spent studying for the exam. Seems petty, but I also have to pay an extortionate amount for parking at my hospital when Im not even guaranteed a space meaning I have to pay for parking across the road.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Jul 2010
Posts
23,792
Location
Lincs
Not when youve done 6 years of medical school, racking up over £100k in just student loan which you have to start paying back as soon as you start earning over £18k a year.

Which you pay back with the same % amount over the threshold as everyone else, so no sympathy there, because the whole point to student loans is they are affordable and to be fair, most people won't pay it all back anyway.

You also have to pay for exams to sit. In order for me to even be anywhere near like short-listed for surgical training I have to at least sit my MRCS part A before november which is £516 out of my taxed income. Let alone the books and the time spent studying for the exam.

As I already said, lots of professionals have CPD and memberships to pay for themselves.

Edit : parking - I agree with you there, that's out of order.
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
26 May 2012
Posts
16,709
Bad example, I'm an accountant and I don't charge more for working weekends :p

lol ;p

I am actually an FY1

commiserations, if i were you, i'd do f2 and then bugger off somewhere else.

If patients outcomes are the priority for Hunt, then why does this contract only apply to doctors in England?

Does he not care about services in Scotland or Wales?

If patient outcomes are a priority for Hunt, he would not have gagged NICE from releasing safe staffing levels for A+E and wards.
But alas, it is not.
the priority for Cameron, Osbourne and Hunt is the rapid sell off of britain's last jewel in its crown.
 
Associate
Joined
18 Feb 2007
Posts
2,162
it's no secret what the end game is. junior doc contracts are the first. then the consultant contract, then nurses/allied healthcare professionals/porters etc.

Actually, Hunt's end game is the complete privatisation of the NHS. And, he's trying to accelerate the process by setting fires beneath the key professions sustaining the NHS. What really irritates me is that his "spin" isn't even convincing. Thankfully most of the public don't seem to have fallen for it thus far, despite the heavy media bias.

So, what will happen next ? In my opinion I think a lot of junior doctors will quit NHS England ; many will relocate to the multiple vacancies that exist within Scotland, Wales & Northern Ireland, and others will head abroad, primarily to Australia & New Zealand. Those that remain in service will likely "work to rule". The most serious impact, however, will be on recruitment of new staff for the future. The number of medical graduates qualifying with degrees is already at an all-time low and this contract imposition will only to serve to exacerbate the problem.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
26 May 2012
Posts
16,709
Actually, Hunt's end game is the complete privatisation of the NHS. And, he's trying to accelerate the process by setting fires beneath the key professions sustaining the NHS. What really irritates me is that his "spin" isn't even convincing. Thankfully most of the public don't seem to have fallen for it thus far, despite the heavy media bias.

yup. hence my ending picture ;p

smL6gre.jpg
 
Associate
Joined
5 Nov 2013
Posts
1,093
Location
Ross-on-Wye
Actually, Hunt's end game is the complete privatisation of the NHS. And, he's trying to accelerate the process by setting fires beneath the key professions sustaining the NHS. What really irritates me is that his "spin" isn't even convincing. Thankfully most of the public don't seem to have fallen for it thus far, despite the heavy media bias.

I think the problem is even bigger than this. IF the NHS does in fact get privatised as is his plan, there will actually be very few doctors remaining in this country and we will end up importing those who emigrated back into the UK for private healthcare. Can you imagine what they are going to have to offer to get us back??
 
Associate
Joined
27 Jul 2009
Posts
590
Location
UK
The most serious impact, however, will be on recruitment of new staff for the future. The number of medical graduates qualifying with degrees is already at an all-time low and this contract imposition will only to serve to exacerbate the problem.

There are a fixed number of places on medical courses throughout the UK, this number is set based on predicted future need. Only around 8% of applicants are accepted onto a course and the drop-out rate is relatively low 2%.
 
Associate
Joined
5 Nov 2013
Posts
1,093
Location
Ross-on-Wye
There are a fixed number of places on medical courses throughout the UK, this number is set based on predicted future need. Only around 8% of applicants are accepted onto a course and the drop-out rate is relatively low 2%.

Not just students, its also those going onto higher qualifications. For instance, from my hospital only 50% of FY2s went onto further qualification in the UK....
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
26,127
It is unsociable at times and it is exhausting but the same can be said for dozens of careers, don't see how junior doctors are more deserving than soldiers, police, fire 'where's the picket line?' service, carers, coast guard etc etc.

Last year when the tube drivers were out on strike everyone was holding doctors up as some sort of angelic figures, what's happened since?

Go and campaign for people working in those sectors you've listed to have improved conditions and pay if you think they have it bad. The answer isn't always "well it's not as bad as some other people have it therefore it's not a problem".
 
Man of Honour
Joined
26 May 2012
Posts
16,709
There are a fixed number of places on medical courses throughout the UK, this number is set based on predicted future need. Only around 8% of applicants are accepted onto a course and the drop-out rate is relatively low 2%.

2%!? 2%!? where u get those figures from?
if you mean university medical degrees, the drop out/fail rate is ~10% PER YEAR (and the course is 5 years short)
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Mar 2006
Posts
6,712
In the Army, 11 years and counting :(. I know all about the pay cuts via the back door, the pay freezes, the pension cuts, the subsidies reductions, the redundancies, the impositions, the under manning, the publicity spins, the skewering of numbers, the paper soldiers. So forgive me if I appear a little hardened against empathy been sought by the junior doctors.

I'm not for one second claiming that there'll be additional clinics or a better service because that extends way beyond baby faced doctors but 13.5% pay rise is astronomical on it's own, then there is the extra pay for working just one in four Saturday's. I think they are just pushing for the sake of pushing now and the 'we'll vote with our feet' line, well lets see that happen when the first couple walk and get their 5 mins of fame before the rest realise that it's just not a viable option.

At the very least there could be a little bit of grace shown and hold their hands up and say, you know what, we've got a fairly good deal out of this, lets take what we have because there's no guarantee an imposition will have the same terms as we've just rejected. But no, the valiant fight against the oppresive government continues.

The 13.5% in basic wage (to offset the other larger cuts in pay ) goes after 3 year and includes removal of pay progression This is a pay cut and removal of safeguards against unsafe hospital staffing, dressed up in lies about patient safety when it in fact does the opposite.
 
Back
Top Bottom