Tories giving the disabled another kicking

When the new CB tests were brought in we didn't qualify for anything as we earn too much. That was the only real visible return on the frankly horrendous amounts of tax we pay. But as long as the work shy are fine...

So we are work shy now. Never mind I'm sure the Bullingdon cowboys will have us in the gas chamber before long.
 
Where have I advocated such a thing?

I didn't say you did? :confused:

It's where government policy is heading. Raiding the disability benefits, making us Dave for when we are ill.

The latter is immensely sorry sighted. Most people can't afford to save for when they have the flu. So what happens? They go to work, spread it around a bit.
 
There will never be an equality of opportunity, it would be absolutely impossible to create. That's ignoring the fact that it's a poor idea and will never happen. The electorate would never vote for it; people work to improve their lot, not to see others be given freely what they have broken their backs for. And if a person is fortunate to inherit then good for them! That wealth also had to be earned.

There are some shockingly Communist views in this thread :(

Nothing communist about having equality of opportunity. It could be as simple as spending money to create a school system where each school is as good quality as every other in the country, so you don't get the current system where wealthy people can move to a good school area to obtain a place and less wealthy have to settle to the failing school down the road.

I think you are getting confused with equality of outcomes which I am not advocating at all.
 
Absolutely, and having thought long and hard about it, I don't have a problem with it at all.

What other human rights are you happy to abuse? If none, can everyone just select one they are happy to abuse, or do you plan to enshrine the abuse of property rightservices in law but expect all other rights to be respected?
 
Nothing communist about having equality of opportunity. It could be as simple as spending money to create a school system where each school is as good quality as every other in the country, so you don't get the current system where wealthy people can move to a good school area to obtain a place and less wealthy have to settle to the failing school down the road.

I think you are getting confused with equality of outcomes which I am not advocating at all.

We had a system based on merit but it was abolished in most areas in the name of equality...

Unless you advocate removal of all children from their parents and equal treatment for them all via the state then equality of opportunity is a myth.
 
I didn't say you did? :confused:

It's where government policy is heading. Raiding the disability benefits, making us Dave for when we are ill.

The latter is immensely sorry sighted. Most people can't afford to save for when they have the flu. So what happens? They go to work, spread it around a bit.

You quoted me without clarification, I was just adding it, especially given the quality of some debaters here who love to argue what they want you to say rather than what you actually did.
 
We had a system based on merit but it was abolished in most areas in the name of equality...

Unless you advocate removal of all children from their parents and equal treatment for them all via the state then equality of opportunity is a myth.

It might be impossible to achieve but that doesn't stop you trying to make it more equal than it currently is. The issue with the grammar school system (which I assume you are alluding to) then all that happens is those that can afford to tutor their children to pass the entrance exam so it wasn't really based on merit.
 
It might be impossible to achieve but that doesn't stop you trying to make it more equal than it currently is. The issue with the grammar school system (which I assume you are alluding to) then all that happens is those that can afford to tutor their children to pass the entrance exam so it wasn't really based on merit.

It's still a better measure than whether your parents can afford to buy a house in the catchment. Being in an area now that still has grammar schools, house hunting is rather different.
 
Oh lets put every penny we make in wages away for a rainy day just in case you fall ill, it's not as simple as that is it.

'Every penny we make in wages' ...

Why such emotional language? How is Dolph incorrect in what he's saying?

If you save sensibly and take responsibility it is really as simple as that. It's incredibly naive and downright stupid expecting the state to pick up after you. If you think this is the last round of cuts for the disabled you're very naive. They'll be coming back for seconds and thirds, fourths and fifths.
 
We had a system based on merit but it was abolished in most areas in the name of equality...

Unless you advocate removal of all children from their parents and equal treatment for them all via the state then equality of opportunity is a myth.
Just because perfect equality doesn't exist, doesn't really strengthen the argument for more inequality of opportunity, does it?
 
Last edited:
No...:confused:

I'm pointing out humans act in bad ways, in the same way all animals do.

If you aren't advocating the law of the jungle, great we've got that clear. With that said I'm not sure what baring such statements about animal behaviour actually have on a discussion about disability benefit.

Yes things happen in the jungle and around the world that are abominable to civilised society; no that doesn't really say the sick and the weak should be discarded.
 
Good. People need to be assessed differently.

The new current craze is agrophobia, all the drug users I deal with dialy have persuaded the authorities into defeat for this condition. That's an extra £40 a week for drugs.

They sit there smoking, I ask how they buy their cigarettes - walked the shop mate...brilliant.

Yes, genuine cases need support but we cannot keep supporting this current system - it's a joke. Do not get me started on mobility cars...the current drug dealer is driving around in a nice VW touran mobility car. He trains in the same gym as me and injects a lot of steroids. It's a joke.

This man makes valid points. If antics like above continue to occur, the benefit system will always be under severe pressures and review. We will forever be wary of claimant as people continue to abuse the system.

Should we? Look to nature; the herd sheds the weak.

Pathetic. Grow up.
 
Just because perfect quality doesn't exist, doesn't really strengthen the argument for more inequality of opportunity, does it?

It depends what drives the inequality. Should the state punish those who made good personal choices through taxation and use the proceeds to reward those who made bad choices through benefits or tax credits?

Should good decisions be negated to reduce the impact of bad ones?

Is that really the way towards a healthy and productive society?
 
It depends what drives the inequality. Should the state punish those who made good personal choices through taxation and use the proceeds to reward those who made bad choices through benefits or tax credits?

Should good decisions be negated to reduce the impact of bad ones?

Is that really the way towards a healthy and productive society?

Not necessarily, but love and empathy certainly are. #utopiandreams
 
I do think the current system needs looking at. For example my father gets a mobility car (or whatever the scheme is) for being deaf in one ear. All while claiming housing benefit and working full time cash in hand. It's just laughable really, and here's me paying vat on glasses so I can see.
 
Critical illness and personal injury insurance is cheap enough though.

It really isn't.
Certainly long term income protection policies are not, when you take them as career specific.
Between life insurance, critical illness, income protection our direct debits total over £300 a month now.
I wouldn't be without them, but knowing the govt. there won't be any capacity should I lose a hand or similar.
 
It depends what drives the inequality. Should the state punish those who made good personal choices through taxation and use the proceeds to reward those who made bad choices through benefits or tax credits?

Should good decisions be negated to reduce the impact of bad ones?

Is that really the way towards a healthy and productive society?

I'm not sure we agree that rising to the top is all about simply making good choices, if we had a meritocracy I'd have greater understanding of your point.

While we're discussing inheritance and equality
http://www.cpag.org.uk/child-poverty-facts-and-figures

9 out of a classroom of 30 live in child poverty is THIS really the way towards a healthy and productive society?
 
I do think the current system needs looking at. For example my father gets a mobility car (or whatever the scheme is) for being deaf in one ear. All while claiming housing benefit and working full time cash in hand. It's just laughable really, and here's me paying vat on glasses so I can see.

Your dads tax evasion is partly to blame for the tax levied on you to be able to see.
 
I do think the current system needs looking at. For example my father gets a mobility car (or whatever the scheme is) for being deaf in one ear. All while claiming housing benefit and working full time cash in hand. It's just laughable really, and here's me paying vat on glasses so I can see.

I think the current system for tax also needs looking at, throughout my life the number of people I have met who admit (casually) to tax avoidance/evasion (which includes your father working cash in hand and likely his BOSS on a grander scale) is staggering.

P.S. avoidance while currently legal needs closing down and evasion needs some serious heads to roll...
 
Back
Top Bottom