Benefit claiming Mother of 8 cant pay the rent?

image_zpsuyw5fpyh.jpg


It's not all bad news.
 
Efour said:
I'm too busy to get a job! Ex-lapdancer mother-of-eight on £20,000 benefits a year who says she 'works' 21 hours a day avoids eviction despite £4,000 unpaid rent bill

mqSAz9a.jpg


This is like the Holy grail of DM headlines and i thought id make you nice, reasonable people aware of the news in order to brighten up your "hate" filled morning. :p Maybe take your strangulating hands from the necks of refugees and politicians for a few brief moments.

For what ever reason this women has gotten herself in this position, 8 kids single parent, how could you kick a family out of a house? Does she have time to work ? Hell no i doubt it, not yet. How on earth can a benefit system not pay the housing association rent direct? How can she have been allowed to have not paid the bill?

She claims 22k a year, that doesn't seem like the sort of money you can raise a family of that size on, what kind of future do these kids have ?

Discuss :D

Ah jesus can a mod change the title - Benefit claiming Mother of 8 cant pay the rent?
Click to expand...

How much does she get from the numerous fathers on top of that 22k though
 
a1ex2001 said:
The trouble here is evicting her doesn't really punish her it punishes her kids who even the most rabid rich conservative can't think is right? The situation with the rent money getting given to the tenants to pass onto the landlords is farcical I can see the logic in the first instance as it gives them an opportunity to learn about budgeting etc but as soon as they fall into significant arrears it should switch to direct payment.

Other than that I'm not really sure what you do in a situation like this, her kids are already massively disadvantaged through no fault of there own cutting her benefits punishes them not her and the less opportunities we give them the more likely the cycle will be repeated.



Taking kids into care is hugely expensive and the long term outcomes for kids in care are worse, so again you will be punishing the child and storing up future problems and expense for the tax payer.
Click to expand...


Take the kids away and give them to the fathers?
 
dowie said:
There ought to be caps on child benefit for a start. Advice on contraception too. If you keep on squeezing out kids you can't support then a requirement to take contraception, failing that the kids go into care.
Click to expand...

Advice will go in one ear and out the other, she/her sexual partners clearly don't give a damn about contraception. It should be made mandatory in cases like this, what kind of lives are these kids going to go on and live :mad:
 
Dis86 said:
Nobody has said to sterilise anyone to remove any 'inferior' trait from the genepool. Not one single person.
Click to expand...

Eugenics, in its original form, before we even had a concept of a gene pool, was about heredity, not genetics. Poverty was seen as an inherited undesirable trait.

Dis86 said:
Like I said, glowing advertisement for the implementation of enforced sterilisation.
Click to expand...

Edit: and again, just now..

Jaaay said:
Advice will go in one ear and out the other, she/her sexual partners clearly don't give a damn about contraception. It should be made mandatory in cases like this, what kind of lives are these kids going to go on and live :mad:
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Woden said:
Eugenics, in its original form, before we even had a concept of a gene pool, was about heredity, not genetics. Poverty was seen as an inherited undesirable trait.



Edit: and again, just now..
Click to expand...

Yes, it was about inherited traits. We've been through that. Where have i mentioned her kids having any potential problems? Nowhere. I don't know if you've noticed right, but we live in 2016. We know that poverty and genes aren't directly linked...
If you'd read instead of just being pompous you would see that nobody has a problem with her children. The problem is her inability to stop having them when she cannot provide for them.
 
estebanrey said:
...and your solution is to have a SWAT team smash down her door in the middle of the night to whip her away to the nearest hospital, restrained and forcibly sterilized?
Click to expand...

Or a letter requiring her to attend an apointment to have a contraceptive coil fitted or implant injection at her local GUM clinic.

Bit less dramatic.
 
estebanrey said:
...and your solution is to have a SWAT team smash down her door in the middle of the night to whip her away to the nearest hospital, restrained and forcibly sterilized?
Click to expand...

No. Way to take things to extremes though...
There is a simple painless and temporary procedure. It's already been posted about in this thread.
 
Dis86 said:
No. Way to take things to extremes though...
There is a simple painless and temporary procedure. It's already been posted about in this thread.
Click to expand...

Which is and how would you make it mandatory?

I'm not taking anything to extremes, just making you actually think about your proposed policy and how it would actually be enforced. Anyone can say 'someone like this woman should be sterilised', but when you spell out the actual horrific additional policies that you need to enforce to make it work it doesn't sound as attractive as the original reactionary Daily Mail sound-bite.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom