then faces a murder charge after the man dies following a scuffle
Key bits
"Mr Batterham says he was assisted by a friend who helped retain Mr Slater [the intruder] in a chokehold until police arrived."
"Mr Batterham was initially charged with recklessly inflicting grievous bodily harm but the charge was upgraded to murder once the life machine was switched off."
If it's as reported then it's hardly fair to be charged with murder - I think almost anyone would have done what they could if they found a stranger in their home, let alone near their daughter's room.
also covered here
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...urder-killing-home-intruder-article-1.2582155
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...bail-8-500-sign-petition-calling-release.html
which also states that the intruder, Slater, had past convictions for breaking and entering.
Although he had broken into someone else's house his mother apparently stated that her son was “murdered in cold blood” and that she wanted his killer to be “brought to justice”
Granted that this happened in Australia and laws may be different, but generally I do think that it's a difficult position to be in when you find someone has broken into your home - if you don't show any aggressiveness they may well leave you alone/not harm anyone but at the same time you're also going to be protective of your family as you just don't know what that person is capable of. In any case apparently they tried to arrest him and so the death would have been probably been an accident.
Is it a simple case that if someone breaks into your home then you should be allowed to protect yourself/your family at any cost?
Key bits
"Mr Batterham says he was assisted by a friend who helped retain Mr Slater [the intruder] in a chokehold until police arrived."
"Mr Batterham was initially charged with recklessly inflicting grievous bodily harm but the charge was upgraded to murder once the life machine was switched off."
If it's as reported then it's hardly fair to be charged with murder - I think almost anyone would have done what they could if they found a stranger in their home, let alone near their daughter's room.
also covered here
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...urder-killing-home-intruder-article-1.2582155
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...bail-8-500-sign-petition-calling-release.html
which also states that the intruder, Slater, had past convictions for breaking and entering.
Although he had broken into someone else's house his mother apparently stated that her son was “murdered in cold blood” and that she wanted his killer to be “brought to justice”
Granted that this happened in Australia and laws may be different, but generally I do think that it's a difficult position to be in when you find someone has broken into your home - if you don't show any aggressiveness they may well leave you alone/not harm anyone but at the same time you're also going to be protective of your family as you just don't know what that person is capable of. In any case apparently they tried to arrest him and so the death would have been probably been an accident.
Is it a simple case that if someone breaks into your home then you should be allowed to protect yourself/your family at any cost?


.